IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-06.txt

Wenbo Zhu <wenboz@google.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E4A1200F3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:24:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wc28zvxmf1EO for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:23:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AAF81200C3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:23:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1iS955-0001tg-Ci for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:21:51 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:21:51 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1iS955-0001tg-Ci@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <wenboz@google.com>) id 1iS953-0001sv-D8 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:21:49 +0000
Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <wenboz@google.com>) id 1iS951-000287-Pz for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:21:49 +0000
Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id x14so5009770ybq.12 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 16:21:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Qo6jMDyF8sbtfq6NZ487EjI6BHlU9msQ3jte9Cu3mIk=; b=GR395dZPux5GXil+WuQLsXW2/MI8/GuzrZA8wnpqXnV+T9DIfgsya+NY2dAnOL+gfq LzSbnTmbWeVMocbRWbP8QhlCDQ+x3Dg87BrxXq1YCHYzHVwDlbAFU75p1KuMz7QZwktB mYVm+MOs1AcphqWw8SAvhoTiATynaz7YCvhVB213mDxDes1pPGwzCCe4LcDhrED43gE7 igRAOjK3niZxp0oJgCuyg4A4fwG3NJs4GQxnzXwMD+fJju+nYjM6dUhtg4//nissT2jS Cqkd6L/E91Z8ylEo3s5RqpQzW1zEKUsgGUsQwSf+iJQuWS9Zyys+DnJ9lnJbb9L3+lqm sEyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Qo6jMDyF8sbtfq6NZ487EjI6BHlU9msQ3jte9Cu3mIk=; b=rhUq6sAlKxOPEHW/FNMPA1HKVOt0QYnPdbFNp+QHTjUFSutXE86x0HpgYbRn/9NtQf O9j912MvHZUFI+vvyETYeSwKtnA1jpCK7n8DB0R8WCvyKsQBTgAAzjPlidV4hj75QtV3 kRySXOEPYSFCreBTEgFyfpacz6G8U3zrSXn7nVS3zlKUDgKDO4JVL8h91QNDknEfYYDq lyqm5Lqe62xLyPoac9y7p8K7xJ7X0X6E2pd5lTBG8dI0Zww4faUTt5mRh0iPWyhQymJ2 CnJasT5bU6Moq8fifZcMvMYr09tZx+yJhAdgTjBTtMuxEeLlKNbZPaYTsIlIR3hi9YiM fCqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVxHQsHqu33enX/oDgXAGSffdI0blnbxQNbZGnTvTh3aEny2Whb YsqdwUqdqc13bkYGhqEQS4x64l1YMEjnbzsGEFcna4GT/Gm42w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwP2D9VzDl0HkMk8ao/IgKahur8btIXD7825ECXN2StAXcOHB82Fl363J9LMfAvdEpqmuzeQlKGSaLJx0Dbc9w=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:8b0a:: with SMTP id i10mr29952695ybl.459.1572999705502; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 16:21:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157288769073.16585.14784054291482195210@ietfa.amsl.com> <20191105065719.GA13557@1wt.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20191105065719.GA13557@1wt.eu>
From: Wenbo Zhu <wenboz@google.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 16:21:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD3-0rN1e6ctNnWygXTWWo=TM1RzvybhXH6kNQjk+bVQxogx1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ae0cf50596a28827"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32; envelope-from=wenboz@google.com; helo=mail-yb1-xb32.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-20.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1iS951-000287-Pz b80b28a8fe0916c5c32ef2fcc57bd5e1
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-06.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAD3-0rN1e6ctNnWygXTWWo=TM1RzvybhXH6kNQjk+bVQxogx1w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37123
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

1) is there a timeline for reviews, i.e. is this a major revision?
2) should clarification questions be raised on
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core?

Thanks.

On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 11:00 PM Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics/
> (...)
>
> Just a heads up on this, I've spent ~45 minutes this morning having a look
> at semantics and messaging. I could be reading them for hours but will not
> have the time before next week. However I'd like to invite all implementers
> to have a deep look into them, as these documents are of incredibly high
> quality with lots of details and suggestions of seldom known corner cases.
> I think that splitting messaging and semantics definitely helps fluidify
> the lecture. Kudos to the editors!
>
> Willy
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email