Re: Strange "downref" to RFC2068 in description of 304 (new Issue 126)
Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net> Thu, 07 August 2008 14:35 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B3028C1A3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 07:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.972
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.972 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.627, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ogJcH-IBbHUr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 07:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8807228C0E4 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 07:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1KR6YH-0004bl-Ma for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:33:17 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([193.51.208.68]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>) id 1KR6YD-0004ap-Mt for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:33:13 +0000
Received: from vps1.henriknordstrom.net ([195.20.207.177]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>) id 1KR6Y3-0006nC-At for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:33:13 +0000
Received: from henriknordstrom.net (183.159.216.81.static.tb.siw.siwnet.net [81.216.159.183]) by vps1.henriknordstrom.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m77EWZpr025610; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:32:35 +0200
Received: from henrik ([127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by henriknordstrom.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m77EWY3C016111 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:32:34 +0200
From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <4898B740.9000400@gmx.de>
References: <4898B614.3030707@gmx.de> <4898B740.9000400@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:34:10 +0200
Message-Id: <1218119650.28467.71.camel@hlaptop.henriknordstrom.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91, clamav-milter version 0.91 on henriknordstrom.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (vps1.henriknordstrom.net [195.20.207.177]); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:32:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: none
X-SPF-Guess: pass
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-2.599
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1KR6Y3-0006nC-At 43c23065f03c49148c8d70e186796f92
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Strange "downref" to RFC2068 in description of 304 (new Issue 126)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/1218119650.28467.71.camel@hlaptop.henriknordstrom.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/5106
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1KR6YH-0004bl-Ma@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:33:17 +0000
tis 2008-08-05 klockan 22:25 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke: > Julian Reschke wrote: > > ... > > (Historical note: that statement apparently was added in > > draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-08) > > ... > > Seems that this issue is related to proposed text in > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg-old/1997JanApr/0884.html>, > which was added too verbatim to the RFC2068bis==RFC2616. Seems so indeed. And as it's clear what really should be referenced (internal reference to Date) i'd say it's an editorial issue. Regards Henrik
- Strange "downref" to RFC2068 in description of 30… Julian Reschke
- Re: Strange "downref" to RFC2068 in description o… Julian Reschke
- Re: Strange "downref" to RFC2068 in description o… Julian Reschke
- Re: Strange "downref" to RFC2068 in description o… Henrik Nordstrom