IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Header Structure Draft 17 -- Any diff from 16?

Ian Clelland <iclelland@google.com> Mon, 16 March 2020 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFE23A0EFA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ECYLOGWgs5jf for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 214273A0EF7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jDuiS-0002xF-Km for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:43:56 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:43:56 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jDuiS-0002xF-Km@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <iclelland@google.com>) id 1jDuiN-0002wO-9Q for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:43:51 +0000
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <iclelland@google.com>) id 1jDuiL-0007Es-PI for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:43:51 +0000
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id b23so23308438edx.4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2ypEaXc8nq7rgt+GDzKF+ri36XWZLbE4hrm4eMFWUTI=; b=Xv24OSAD3oFD+KzipwBawcZljDZY4vrQiZmc8KitU6Hy06EI1LethvhCwwPkXkUT58 5/+NxCtpZbL3sHMJX0a4E1Lj/FGUFIobKLR/dPU2B8W5geHuHTvMYwwPDEpUibRknc/u DSobxSoSf9FIHN1iDkJW3BByx/TmrwWou7QL3t2Teabi9llhl3TEiYRj3d2DAmZL5kDw 2QU6JU3HO4ALOl88EPh4GY9TJ7T210v9wx+TIpBXQyf6kB+VocJaxsVmouLn0fun7G31 1yVJBCZoL8ojeCX8xoh8+2O+mOVj9+rN4ooqw65iYxs8nkUQE0SsyjF5f9/8TU4MVq7Z bCeA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2ypEaXc8nq7rgt+GDzKF+ri36XWZLbE4hrm4eMFWUTI=; b=GeeqLcbvMW3iQrEITjeqDKz/jSVcY6+cvzeWZw0jXVGdpcixkT5Ytv5syq9PPdj4Yg Q0+imvlevbcZoXxCOR4Jhdxmji72LRqb/2i1htfsjf3T33Uy/3aOUxnxtiKjXZ1Uz0oq 2XrSiN0FcTOwbPGVw7qXkPFfkiVRBFZiCN04qlk5IME1+UU+w/f53e+sBYqpkPfz1px+ RwgFhuoaqSjnWwP11/u9I7RaDievmFewP+W/zRXPgMiQB7KIGalgd/IpE8IiUZvozxvq M9tgAvLSeyDOfYCzuEY61LDi34pLg1MXZyj6mfnw8xftETNYxS5IgC2TNBJlz4zNlz3T HFdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3eBhmGHXTVhsFQ7w3ZAjbv/5TWrzOYNuGBKOQnehdp18u3b+RW gzW9WqrSKX6bcjIOGsFA6Zp+5dIybMd8pex+RzGaNg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtVSMyzQGdslqWzRwNQ7oy3EelwNlXlpz8KPKveODJtW9JF5rdWv/Q0lT1L5kZJl8cogtTmfo65dmti/cyxIRk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5390:: with SMTP id g16mr603689ejo.152.1584384217640; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAK_TSXJVYvdir2Venmp3Rp1MbbaFg5tcvzhSczKK3K=NrQMZUA@mail.gmail.com> <0e263fb2-9dfc-5351-e9fd-a5c736636fc5@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <0e263fb2-9dfc-5351-e9fd-a5c736636fc5@gmx.de>
From: Ian Clelland <iclelland@google.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:43:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CAK_TSX+Lo8dn+ZtBh94jrOy2NctWxHRPJspYeZj6U0AUvqyL9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007b719905a0fd325a"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::531; envelope-from=iclelland@google.com; helo=mail-ed1-x531.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-21.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1jDuiL-0007Es-PI 18d0e92f4ca795a3a195db2d77a229f2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Header Structure Draft 17 -- Any diff from 16?
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAK_TSX+Lo8dn+ZtBh94jrOy2NctWxHRPJspYeZj6U0AUvqyL9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37448
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Thanks -- that works.

Any idea why the (apparently) auto-generated announcement email would have
a URL that doesn't work?

Also, should there have been a changelog from draft 16?

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 1:57 PM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
wrote:

> On 16.03.2020 17:05, Ian Clelland wrote:
> > I just got the announcement for SH draft 17, and went to check out the
> > differences since 16, and noticed that the diff link isn't working, and
> > the text[2] has no changelog from draft 16. (C.1 is "Since
> > draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-15")
> >
> > I'm going to check the commit logs to see if there were substantive
> > changes, but this looks like an error somewhere.
> >
> > [1] Diff link from the email is
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-17,
> which
> > brings up an error.
> > [2] Checked text version at
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-17.
>
> Try
>
>
> <
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-17.txt
> >
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email