Re: Request to AD-sponsor publication of draft-wilde-service-link-rel-06 and draft-wilde-sunset-header-06

Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net> Mon, 17 September 2018 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB3C130E2B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 05:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=dret.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5MzLGSUmpWFF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 05:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF70F1271FF for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 05:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1g1stK-0002vp-Jn for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:44:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:44:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1g1stK-0002vp-Jn@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <erik.wilde@dret.net>) id 1g1stF-0002v6-Ht for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:44:33 +0000
Received: from dret.net ([209.188.86.86] helo=postoffice.gristmillmedia.com) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <erik.wilde@dret.net>) id 1g1stE-00065k-6T for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:44:33 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dret.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4TtuLd7KRptRSpc8vkEGd55jI1fXbnTB6kAsNiNqCZE=; b=YFRWAiTKu1ZajGuVSVroJHvcYT +ULE2+uYEASLMQWZNiBbi0q5myxh8+4x93eIsA1h8FRlxjkmA5tbHbaz5OQAhOvwPFwlyTfK99xuI WxLIBjncf03h99LjMywpFx0cScKXO4/4hdY/1Y19Cqte5cqFSdjOySDePtuGcMuVG/RhlfI3GArA/ Snr1bA4X12d25E8QiYttp4S31j7YemddXPPVeVCEGSly1vfQ1gB+KNgtSCjdZVxjRVS3BhwMhIZ6P SC8GXllYJGpaETY18816OZVya0yAJTbYYIatOIGDTOyUyFPxcbCCaSUltcKqWkj07HdfoAz0Aig4V zqPMFK9g==;
Received: from 116.244.6.85.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch ([85.6.244.116]:63490 helo=dretpro.home) by postoffice.gristmillmedia.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <erik.wilde@dret.net>) id 1g1sss-0007v4-AL; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 08:44:10 -0400
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <47c1123f-587f-d6e2-14bd-3cb273b2fb83@isode.com>
From: Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>
Message-ID: <b44cfd8a-184b-2ae3-c7d3-7132d812ae99@dret.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:44:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <47c1123f-587f-d6e2-14bd-3cb273b2fb83@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - postoffice.gristmillmedia.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - w3.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dret.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: postoffice.gristmillmedia.com: authenticated_id: birdhouse@dret.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: postoffice.gristmillmedia.com: birdhouse@dret.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1g1stE-00065k-6T fb0242c396c563cdae6a20512ff2c355
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Request to AD-sponsor publication of draft-wilde-service-link-rel-06 and draft-wilde-sunset-header-06
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/b44cfd8a-184b-2ae3-c7d3-7132d812ae99@dret.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35918
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

hello alexey.

On 2018-08-29 11:02, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> I've been asked by Erik Wilde to AD-sponsor publication of the following
> 2 documents:
> 
> 1) "Link Relation Types for Web Services":
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wilde-service-link-rel/>
> 2) "The Sunset HTTP Header":
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wilde-sunset-header/>
> 
> I am soliciting feedback on these documents, in particular:
> 
> a) Do people think that these are useful documents and that they should
> be published as RFCs? (Both statements of support and objections are
> appreciated. Feel free to send your replies directly to me.)
> 
> b) If people think that these are useful contributions to the RFC
> series, does this WG wants to take one or both of them as WG items or is
> it Ok for me to just AD-sponsor them?
> 
> Assuming response to publishing these 2 documents is positive, I am also
> looking for document shepherds to help out with reviews and publication
> process. If you never done this and want to learn, these are probably
> good documents to start with, as they are both short and relatively simple.

is there anything i can do to help? i think we've seen a bit of feedback 
but not much. nobody seemed to object, so that's something positive. but 
i am not sure how to proceed from here.

thanks and cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:erik.wilde@dret.net |
            | http://dret.net/netdret    |
            | http://twitter.com/dret    |