IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit-00.txt

Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> Tue, 12 October 2021 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073953A1698 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y_4L2H79g_YX for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26EC63A1640 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1maKUf-0000D2-PD for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:19:09 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:19:09 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1maKUf-0000D2-PD@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <jricher@mit.edu>) id 1maKUd-0000CG-DE for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:19:07 +0000
Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11] helo=outgoing.mit.edu) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <jricher@mit.edu>) id 1maKUb-00081U-Lz for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:19:07 +0000
Received: from smtpclient.apple (static-71-174-62-56.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [71.174.62.56]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 19CGIqHT025886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:18:52 -0400
From: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Message-Id: <A35D5CEA-C0CF-4ADF-9F8C-AD192415BE9E@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FDB8E984-0446-428B-986B-D026E86F3BE1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:18:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <43D9422B-7394-4C16-AFCB-BD33B0948ECE@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
References: <163356151986.31315.12684234198541606446@ietfa.amsl.com> <43D9422B-7394-4C16-AFCB-BD33B0948ECE@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1maKUb-00081U-Lz c0c97de26588ed8a8e518e1ef01d1bd5
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit-00.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/A35D5CEA-C0CF-4ADF-9F8C-AD192415BE9E@mit.edu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/39448
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I think this is a great idea and we should push this work forward. In the Signatures draft, we’d love to be able to point to a separate document for information about canonicalizing fields wherever possible. We can already do that with things that are native structured fields, and this would allow us to point to a list that lets  you say “you can treat it as a native structured field even if it’s not defined as one”. 

 — Justin

> On Oct 6, 2021, at 7:07 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> FYI. 
> 
> This was previously hidden in the binary structured fields draft, but it seems potentially useful for other purposes -- e.g., exposing more fields in a structure-oriented API for HTTP (e.g., Fetch), canonicalising fields (e.g., for Signatures), etc.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit-00.txt
>> Date: 7 October 2021 at 10:05:19 am AEDT
>> To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net <mailto:mnot@mnot.net>>
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit-00.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> Name:		draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit
>> Revision:	00
>> Title:		Retrofit Structured Fields for HTTP
>> Document date:	2021-10-07
>> Group:		Individual Submission
>> Pages:		14
>> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit-00.txt <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit-00.txt>
>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit/>
>> Html:           https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit-00.html <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit-00.html>
>> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit>
>> 
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>   This specification defines how a selection of existing HTTP fields
>>   can be handled as Structured Fields.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/ <https://www.mnot.net/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email