Re: Protocol Action: 'HTTP Immutable Responses' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-03.txt)

Sawood Alam <ibnesayeed@gmail.com> Mon, 07 August 2017 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC9E1324F5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 11:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lwjpnl0marMj for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 11:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63E52132640 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1demt8-00019c-N4 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:36:26 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:36:26 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1demt8-00019c-N4@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ibnesayeed@gmail.com>) id 1demst-00018q-8t for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:36:11 +0000
Received: from mail-vk0-f44.google.com ([209.85.213.44]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ibnesayeed@gmail.com>) id 1demso-00015v-8X for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:36:11 +0000
Received: by mail-vk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id r199so4892262vke.4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=10pgGIevMJd6TeJyacO45EITJTkiiwk9AsuP/2R8hQ4=; b=XhggdwGFjDCsUpUx1lLSgkKenht70i0I28pefF8pTJXowR19hMhU3trm2CQsur1SVt UT7D/T15xhxVTA77+lu81mkbyyLT40qSCzIS/I8OsOxeTq0CdkCs+LyspWVqvQUMSvl4 us4h8Zp+Xhue3YdlnzI69Z73uN1lcIFrUzQ+fdaqNf4PFYM3gpN+eBZH9msZB3j1sIMP VgtwExFUgOg9fEi7kJ7GtuYOJqu4TICulGnzP3Yz/+ae581stNJz9WnrVEkZtysD+sO6 EyA3//3adDg8R4sUYFnGlu+rg0MRniJfNhPO2mnLhZOGwnHsIdpZgKdmQOxuTVm/n71a ZKSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=10pgGIevMJd6TeJyacO45EITJTkiiwk9AsuP/2R8hQ4=; b=NovOnluk18Hhwxt4gw0tNnl8ZioBxBo83jN7VSg5jMymx01TmPl5guP7vvIrWhBy/g e4axg6lT5mtFEqwMBhAglD6Toi5v/nT7RnlnwBFMpaY97M/AhrnckqmPRhA1858PdIht aHzPrWuj6oA7rSU6gUgh2YnKuqEc/wqy4dCqT0vsVr7vTFl8BTYCC2slP95upHyfcWQf X3rvzpxOZiaHHxr11ozcbJ1Yun0olGbGJhCat7YVLTsMACWebVMz90zdo0HLnyLW81ZN ACC0y9ZI6iSdLYGAgSIRfK0zhkiXAwT+5Y0fl/5AVFwO9OwBudXZz3trMRhbhT4V2VNC Mumg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5h6UE7dQAB/KU0VsekcpILDwtvBCWpJ6C7XquUrz6eGEaHQuv5J tKdVXjpgT+DDLbZ+iEzUXOrbKSV5UQ==
X-Received: by 10.31.50.134 with SMTP id y128mr783077vky.197.1502130945118; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <150212870836.18997.10755060622696304817.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150212870836.18997.10755060622696304817.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Sawood Alam <ibnesayeed@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:35:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CALOnmf-re+Bd19uHWbyxx1KPE+GC+kef14vTWMzbZCuVm-gNQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable@ietf.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, alexey.melnikov@isode.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11438cf263d80c05562e1d86"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.213.44; envelope-from=ibnesayeed@gmail.com; helo=mail-vk0-f44.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1demso-00015v-8X 757961d0038ba9dcfa354823291bb3dd
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Protocol Action: 'HTTP Immutable Responses' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-03.txt)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CALOnmf-re+Bd19uHWbyxx1KPE+GC+kef14vTWMzbZCuVm-gNQg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/34321
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I think the web archiving community as well as the content-addressable
file-system community will be very interested in this. I have shared this
in the IPFS forum already and now I am going to share with the web
archiving community.

https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/http-immutable-responses-proposed-standard/905

Best,

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:02 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:

> The IESG has approved the following document:
> - 'HTTP Immutable Responses'
>   (draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-03.txt) as Proposed Standard
>
> This document is the product of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol Working
> Group.
>
> The IESG contact persons are Adam Roach, Alexey Melnikov and Ben Campbell.
>
> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable/
>
>
>
>
> Technical Summary
>
> The immutable HTTP response Cache-Control extension allows servers to
> identify resources that will
> not be updated during their freshness lifetime. This assures that a client
> never needs to
> revalidate a cached fresh resource to be certain it has not been modified.
>
> Working Group Summary
>
> Nothing interesting to report here.
>
> Document Quality
>
> This document quickly gained broad interest within the Working Group, and
> then support. It has been
> reviewed by a substantial number of participants, and implemented by
> Mozilla in Firefox, and by
> Facebook and others on the server side. Microsoft and Squid have stated
> that they are in the
> process of implementing.
>
> Personnel
>
> Mark Nottingham is the document shepherd; Alexey Melnikov is the
> responsible Area Director.
>
> --

--
Sawood Alam
Department of Computer Science
Old Dominion University
Norfolk VA 23529