I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-10.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue, 18 February 2020 16:11 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F2B1208AB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:11:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nPzTKU1RZ1KA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:11:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A56DF12082C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:11:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1j45Q2-0007Jv-CH for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:08:18 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:08:18 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1j45Q2-0007Jv-CH@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1j45Px-0006t4-Dq for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:08:13 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1j45Pv-0007hX-6G for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:08:13 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0152120817; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:07:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.117.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Reply-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <158204207992.13994.4774023466131607685@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:07:59 -0800
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.44; envelope-from=internet-drafts@ietf.org; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_NW=1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1j45Pv-0007hX-6G 2c563574ae1dcaaa0e26dc2fc327a8a7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-10.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/158204207992.13994.4774023466131607685@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37363
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the HTTP WG of the IETF. Title : HTTP Client Hints Authors : Ilya Grigorik Yoav Weiss Filename : draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-10.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2020-02-18 Abstract: HTTP defines proactive content negotiation to allow servers to select the appropriate response for a given request, based upon the user agent's characteristics, as expressed in request headers. In practice, clients are often unwilling to send those request headers, because it is not clear whether they will be used, and sending them impacts both performance and privacy. This document defines an Accept-CH response header that servers can use to advertise their use of request headers for proactive content negotiation, along with a set of guidelines for the creation of such headers, colloquially known as "Client Hints." The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-10 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-10.txt internet-drafts