Re: 1xx response semantics
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Tue, 05 July 2011 07:18 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D9E21F85B6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 00:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4M4Ff0koPAaa for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 00:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A591921F854B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 00:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1QdztM-0007x4-8s for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:17:56 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>) id 1QdztB-0007vq-Rq for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:17:45 +0000
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk ([130.225.244.222]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>) id 1QdztA-0001KD-U1 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:17:45 +0000
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter-phk.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEC75DB8; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 07:17:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p657HMFg002964; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 07:17:22 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:53:39 +0200." <20110705065339.GF12909@1wt.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:17:22 +0000
Message-ID: <2963.1309850242@critter.freebsd.dk>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=130.225.244.222; envelope-from=phk@critter.freebsd.dk; helo=phk.freebsd.dk
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1QdztA-0001KD-U1 d861d70b9f1035f3e5484be6af042e04
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: 1xx response semantics
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/2963.1309850242@critter.freebsd.dk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/10887
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1QdztM-0007x4-8s@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:17:56 +0000
In message <20110705065339.GF12909@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes: >On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 06:13:03AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >After all, saying that 101 is an exception to 1xx >is not much different from saying that 204 is an exception to 2xx in >that it does not hold any body. Explaining that it is in the wrong group would make the overall scheme clearer and hopefully deter similar additions in the future. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
- Re: 1xx response semantics Julian Reschke
- Re: 1xx response semantics Adrien de Croy
- 1xx response semantics Mark Nottingham
- Re: 1xx response semantics Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: 1xx response semantics Willy Tarreau
- Re: 1xx response semantics Amos Jeffries
- Re: 1xx response semantics Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 1xx response semantics Willy Tarreau
- Re: 1xx response semantics Willy Tarreau
- Re: 1xx response semantics Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 1xx response semantics Willy Tarreau
- Re: 1xx response semantics Willy Tarreau
- Re: 1xx response semantics Joe Orton
- Re: 1xx response semantics Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 1xx response semantics Roy T. Fielding
- Re: 1xx response semantics Brian Pane
- Re: 1xx response semantics Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: 1xx response semantics Roy T. Fielding
- Re: 1xx response semantics Roy T. Fielding
- Re: 1xx response semantics Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 1xx response semantics Willy Tarreau
- Re: 1xx response semantics Willy Tarreau
- Re: 1xx response semantics Willy Tarreau
- Re: 1xx response semantics Mark Nottingham
- Re: 1xx response semantics Brian Pane
- Re: 1xx response semantics Julian Reschke
- Re: 1xx response semantics Amos Jeffries
- pipelining initial request series Roy T. Fielding
- pipelining initial request series Brian Pane
- Re: 1xx response semantics Willy Tarreau
- Re: pipelining initial request series Willy Tarreau
- Re: 1xx response semantics Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 1xx response semantics Julian Reschke
- Re: 1xx response semantics Willy Tarreau
- Re: 1xx response semantics Julian Reschke
- Re: 1xx response semantics Willy Tarreau
- Re: 1xx response semantics Julian Reschke
- Re: 1xx response semantics Joe Orton
- Re: 1xx response semantics Mark Nottingham