IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 04 November 2020 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19573A1322 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:12:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5qTRa5E-hFVl for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:12:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BA743A132D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:12:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1kaLLl-0003Jm-MQ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 16:09:29 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 16:09:29 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1kaLLl-0003Jm-MQ@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1kaLLk-0003Ig-AK for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 16:09:28 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1kaLLi-0001gj-Br for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 16:09:28 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1604506142; bh=eAvNW+a7NFofunsGg3tpgv3MoEQF1yMk3O6JNSf68+M=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=UjvhIlypEwHVeUZ2h5PxU6KmKjTX7lHBAlNYqEf8RiQ6g1RH4CGgcjJz6eQut36gL 8Fm017IxFDUkc8RSP3ITREZB2CS0Gcu9za4evBDfXxyT6AEqxOyFlIFT0R3kmYOpNB jLiS9bJu1mHihOSSSZydeUtiGwU0ZHLyKIHL/570=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([84.171.145.1]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MuDXz-1kM7yV2YcX-00uXQW; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 17:09:02 +0100
To: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <CALOnmf-e24a=9ScKg3M==cSpG8TMd1JnMiecWgUMtD0a17xRgA@mail.gmail.com> <a599a2ba-ad97-b87d-6762-422cde1c1a41@gmx.de> <63989.1604496297@critter.freebsd.dk> <9a4f77e0-edc1-1813-a492-a19cd18410a2@gmx.de> <64090.1604498182@critter.freebsd.dk> <c34cc3ae-2ee0-3c7c-94c9-0dc4bce8e708@gmx.de> <CAP9qbHXnoYWBw3DoiTbnd6=vOfHRUpSi8-j8fYno+f+mAvT-yg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <e93f6b3a-7c24-6e76-f3e5-d2e64c77a944@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 17:09:03 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAP9qbHXnoYWBw3DoiTbnd6=vOfHRUpSi8-j8fYno+f+mAvT-yg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:vxkrl3ovC2EfXK5sfRoHz40/V2QOhYYRf+mpfrZEQ+TvrVMF05Z GC8xg6CAt97U3a78PzdiDePQkrfSXEPVsV6byEO2OpihbBUVTVsILGsvu2d4LpjBSU6WGsM XuUimecPIOrmMdso4MRZ6+nG0unA7JBSN9EMtN5L0FmUGx+HsPIwohcvMDeagC0Ht0xi+Uk /VgqV0nvOXEDR8LhtQ1xw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:p0JD58jpObc=:o+uVmT2YucYactFPNAhFvv gk3GM4+kYsHVUUQJSJ3gYxAlAyKINQL9fdOIF2J5GKZNenirsic09YDhNLKyP9w/8IgRd164M nYxaZ6DVL+nQmkvXsSopuaYZz35BBoZxYRHfqMheLChU7CbNzz4I+p0asrpINnUK1Kp2lSTyv dWRNRWFn7FaSTKcYvlOUUrGPXhEx6DLcizIbj9ffLQuJ6rQZKsaeGb3zt2y3H6oUrXJ2K9FM9 ETpmKGqT4ZVwwYE1ioKz1Enzi1P+tfemTnctbr+vSsAm4t740js1J1MfJDgCwSUreUBQ8Kcpd LJ4o80L4fXm62Bo8f7ukYxo1YoZYbgpPJEjEGwKpeQBMlSqh/EMv5yCRjocpGJrUcW3aU1i6N R1c9dld4XiC03JqFk8x6vlftebCDfCcB7pe7iswKruittewu7heIMYtfKV+GSporTOuv6Bijg blWRl1YuWRj6YWxNQi/byBosPZmPaIUPzpAquhTqg9yQ6zTxpWPu+PAeBAM9UJY2BfopPLSjb TFv/trr3x3VGOpe26ZMEx49ebL5L0xz6tWyfwacAi6Nl9nXp7rcNTmrGiURpMfvbr871H+HJn Wy8W22I/d+UD4CGbmGXnK2AJD3nf0UPMT7MgGSMwyBfF9nsitS3gUS4kue8Z8FfhHb6BntnNz 6Dx+jFzamBt31+vmKq+0vvW1qbXTYq2r2wTztQy8XHCeErzuMgCNAUSUseK0levyRhGXMRqIR fkkFmwFeBY/4JeXtTUwkXRiSpA7lz17erqpduncEAqpGQPSUb26S5xHrupNi0989Vm8FbWi52 IjyJmZ5LfG4NA8+yoKmvaO5U0oS6SZHw/MPL3nYHLLDbnEQkQOL23/xsMv/KW1T5CsBYO8goa IZ1nfQ5JbGbJdAmxmuIu4sllxRnrjCYQmWh1868os=
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.15; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1kaLLi-0001gj-Br e8406934df3b1a3fcb7651a292adf4e3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method?
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/e93f6b3a-7c24-6e76-f3e5-d2e64c77a944@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38156
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Am 04.11.2020 um 16:12 schrieb Roberto Polli:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Il giorno mer 4 nov 2020 alle ore 15:22 Julian Reschke
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> ha scritto:
>> ... we essentially want to define something that is
>> the same as POST, with the additional property of being safe by
>> definition. Nothing more specific than that.
>
> Q:  POST is cacheable (under conditions). I was curious why SEARCH is
> not cacheable: this can be useful...

Cacheability is an open TODO. I agree that it's supposed to be at least
as cacheable as POST :-).

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email