I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-04.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 08 June 2022 08:04 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C96C139549 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 01:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RsiIcJQzidSJ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 01:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A5FAC138FC6 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 01:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1nyqfC-000815-Dh for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:03:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:03:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1nyqfC-000815-Dh@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1nyqfA-0007zm-GZ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:03:36 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1nyqf9-0007s2-3H for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:03:36 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB385C138FCB; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 01:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.3.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Reply-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <165467538281.64287.16279751282904470165@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 01:03:02 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.223.129.194; envelope-from=internet-drafts@ietf.org; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_NW=1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1nyqf9-0007s2-3H f9c065fdfe2b74c232303bd48170bd07
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-04.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/165467538281.64287.16279751282904470165@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40084
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the HTTP WG of the IETF.
Title : Retrofit Structured Fields for HTTP
Author : Mark Nottingham
Filename : draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-04.txt
Pages : 14
Date : 2022-06-08
Abstract:
This specification nominates a selection of existing HTTP fields as
having syntax that is compatible with Structured Fields, so that they
can be handled as such (subject to certain caveats).
To accommodate some additional fields whose syntax is not compatible,
it also defines mappings of their semantics into new Structured
Fields. It does not specify how to negotiate their use.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit/
There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-04.html
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-04
Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-retrofit-04.txt internet-drafts