Re: New Version Notification for draft-benfield-http2-p2p-00.txt

Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk> Wed, 22 July 2015 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB401A894A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id POnjoWbV4l02 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D42371A897D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZHwm5-0001Uz-QQ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:21:41 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:21:41 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZHwm5-0001Uz-QQ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1ZHwm2-0001Tw-QY for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:21:38 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1ZHwm1-0001L7-5E for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:21:38 +0000
Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so170864038wib.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=1ei9Bz6Vi2T7xy5CCalaiv8Lr4T340UXkevCrRctYWY=; b=g4lvwtar/Etrwa+dZHcFm+XllQZiTKE1IQ0j0T8BF+bPXL5B65clFCK7wG5LWRQhaM CPi9HHyN814JzOZsLQ5rjPLgqxT9maooALFPHRlWWeMBsn07zTTRf1V5yqT1Kpx9TjjI DgI5actMMjyflbgljIv6R7QsVa8qK2UIfZ87892qRbadLm6txGGPEFF1eHlslOQX3GLm 5HViIqAjRPI3JJAA78ePGYY9BQlNkT2e/LGpfMqQppjSJ3t7L91hxjIIpYukEtwrzBVe eiPJC7nj4XC6g9KtoxE5LAkYpdZ3UAilM7l7PTQRGawYqrvSeXPK4CBegqZxRKcXU3i0 Nh5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlWLQEgIJzG0oI+TBhqYdQ7uJNvxiI5tP73JlWIjED7yfE3zdnLt7wnYgbrloTJgI+IT2fq
X-Received: by 10.180.83.65 with SMTP id o1mr8067756wiy.14.1437582070524; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from corys-mbp-3.home (host81-129-190-37.range81-129.btcentralplus.com. [81.129.190.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ev8sm3132652wjb.8.2015.07.22.09.21.08 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20150721125417.GA21581@LK-Perkele-VII>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:21:10 +0100
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <30ABEDE8-3A73-4E01-A529-CF4AE7854DDD@lukasa.co.uk>
References: <20150720154654.4782.23539.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E129FA4F-D9A5-423F-9AF1-BFA8E2B475D4@lukasa.co.uk> <20150720164111.GA4353@LK-Perkele-VII> <91F58AAC-FEBA-44AB-AC9B-D6C785A947FC@lukasa.co.uk> <20150721125417.GA21581@LK-Perkele-VII>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.176; envelope-from=cory@lukasa.co.uk; helo=mail-wi0-f176.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.817, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZHwm1-0001L7-5E 0cbe7c7f2e778942e8b697bfe51d48e6
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-benfield-http2-p2p-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/30ABEDE8-3A73-4E01-A529-CF4AE7854DDD@lukasa.co.uk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30035
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 21 Jul 2015, at 13:54, Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> wrote:
> Can't server just set SETTINGS_PUSH_PROMISE to 1 after obtaining
> SETTINGS_PEER_TO_PEER 1 from client? And SETTINGS_PEER_TO_PEER 1
> from client would mean that the server MAY do that?

Oh that makes more sense! Yeah, I think that can work just fine. I’ll make that revision. Thanks!