IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 10 June 2015 05:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1731A1A92B9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 22:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i1OgQSSYx6F5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 22:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 598DF1A92BB for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 22:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Z2YSY-000788-Gu for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 05:21:54 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 05:21:54 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Z2YSY-000788-Gu@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Z2YSP-00077N-45 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 05:21:45 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Z2YSN-0002n7-Dh for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 05:21:44 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7795422E1F4; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 01:21:16 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXbVyVS5-suX9xFO4jmEQqSnO5C+Qu8FMac+hLwZef3uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:21:14 +1000
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <34149FC8-10B0-4CC4-A223-28E702301DF1@mnot.net>
References: <20150608130135.22475.59784.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0D9D95B0-54F0-47BF-9CC8-11BF4E8D763A@mnot.net> <CABkgnnXbVyVS5-suX9xFO4jmEQqSnO5C+Qu8FMac+hLwZef3uQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.311, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Z2YSN-0002n7-Dh 12ee6358b925f41eb4ed55adeed5dd1d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/34149FC8-10B0-4CC4-A223-28E702301DF1@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29745
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

[ paring down CC: list ]

> On 10 Jun 2015, at 7:09 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I wonder if it would be helpful to explicitly motivate it — i.e., say this header is there to make the information available at the HTTP layer during CONNECT, so that the server can refuse the connection gracefully if they like (e.g., with a 403); without it, the server would have to sniff ALPN in the tunnel and then close the connection rudely.
> 
> I think that we're going to need some review on this change.
> 
> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/a62c60a

Looks OK to me - others?

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email