[Errata Rejected] RFC7725 (5512)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 09 November 2022 08:59 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5739C1594A3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:59:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QYsc2w2Khoya for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDAF2C1594AC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:59:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1osgTL-00BiZe-0F for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:30:11 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:30:11 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1osgTL-00BiZe-0F@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>) id 1osgTJ-00BiXW-0Z for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:30:09 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([50.223.129.200] helo=rfcpa.amsl.com) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>) id 1osgTH-008dbS-LA for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:30:08 +0000
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 1E3DB1FD20; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:29:56 -0800 (PST)
To: curtself.cs@gmail.com, tbray@textuality.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221109082956.1E3DB1FD20@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:29:56 -0800
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.223.129.200; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com; helo=rfcpa.amsl.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1osgTH-008dbS-LA 21e60312c0439d78bfdb84bc5dab26b1
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Errata Rejected] RFC7725 (5512)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20221109082956.1E3DB1FD20@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40542
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7725, "An HTTP Status Code to Report Legal Obstacles". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5512 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Editorial Reported by: Curt Self <curtself.cs@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2018-10-02 Rejected by: Francesca Palombini (IESG) Section: 3 Original Text ------------- Note that in many cases clients can still access the denied resource by using technical countermeasures such as a VPN or the Tor network. Corrected Text -------------- (remove the sentence) Notes ----- I understand that the status code itself is kind of a joke (Fahrenheit 451), but the sentence above seems to have no place in a technical document. It provides no insight into use cases for either a client or implementing software. --VERIFIER NOTES-- This statement went through IETF and IESG review as part of the original document. Removing it would be a material change to the contents of the document without first gaining consensus from the appropriate parties. The errata process cannot be used to make this kind of material change. -------------------------------------- RFC7725 (draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04) -------------------------------------- Title : An HTTP Status Code to Report Legal Obstacles Publication Date : February 2016 Author(s) : T. Bray Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : HTTP Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7725 (5512) RFC Errata System