Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Sun, 06 January 2013 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACFA21F873E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 01:57:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ztuyOvs74Doq for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 01:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B573F21F8750 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 01:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1TrmxB-0007kp-IL for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:55:41 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:55:41 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1TrmxB-0007kp-IL@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1Trmx8-0007k5-3N for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:55:38 +0000
Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1Trmx6-0003sE-Db for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:55:37 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ep20so12884697lab.32 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:55:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=h3KH/iRRnwUSWke77Cly6Fd3hMCtGb0N9VL1jFGREI8=; b=TRf8qIlDJ7O/x10fjw0E4WKlTmWnxyU/8IMkhrz0mnKiKwHRQZzMHkHtalQfiEKaWD q1M/+DHW4lGWwYFChZPFv9S7dddLJDhbGW24nsae9UxLpk72WQ+G9DxiK033R9WSOTag vDPNRvzwAM32sM334B5yYpWiJLE/k/YGhO/eVAUin9l9gkIv1TfedXAwt4viY/uu/OpC 0AriFn3iOu5LA2Jvm8XmlF7D34HrNXeWS09g3f4EFprd1Ni/Yd40SXFuxC3j75jZxFBL 6++PlyYVvcakLHRFzOys1JTYok/bStvT7DO2DuMLmcl0U/l4uDwYuxfjueG4DZ1lfkkX oR0g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.123.49 with SMTP id lx17mr2709139lab.52.1357466109711; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:55:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.81.5 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 01:55:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50E93B9B.1080506@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <B7943590-9C82-4B5B-B084-89347B9B7D6A@mnot.net> <A7C46E35-DFC2-4E7B-A41A-5074ACEBA31C@mnot.net> <50E93B9B.1080506@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:55:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNeKot9cuZprj3aeZ3HF_H8-E40OT98x-Vh7F6HoRFr_RA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d044270d043946204d29bb5e2"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.45; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f45.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.689, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Trmx6-0003sE-Db 3572eee262385a19d0b341316cb5f87a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAP+FsNeKot9cuZprj3aeZ3HF_H8-E40OT98x-Vh7F6HoRFr_RA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/15796
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Do you have some suggestions Martin?
The obvious thing in my mind is to get submissions from site owners, but
that takes interest on their part first. :/

-=R


On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:53 AM, "Martin J. Dürst"
<duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>wrote:

> On 2013/01/06 14:57, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
>> Quick follow-up:
>>
>> I posted more about this here:
>>    http://www.mnot.net/blog/2013/**01/04/http2_header_compression<http://www.mnot.net/blog/2013/01/04/http2_header_compression>
>>
>> In particular, we have graphs for all of the HAR samples I took earlier:
>>    http://http2.github.com/http_**samples/mnot/<http://http2.github.com/http_samples/mnot/>
>>
>
> These look very interesting. Just two points for the moment:
>
> - Drawing connected curves seems misleading, because we are not
> mesuring/showing a continuous quantity that varies over time, but discrete
> requests and responses.
>
> - The data sample includes big guys only. Some criticism of speedy has
> said that it is geared towards the big guys. Is there a way to get some
> more of an impression of how headers look at the long tail of websites?
>
> Regards,   Martin.
>
>