Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?

William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> Fri, 25 January 2013 00:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732B51F0CF7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:58:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.065
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.065 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.612, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5WU4JS7xR4z2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:58:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87C11F0CB3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:58:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1TyXc5-0006JT-Gy for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:57:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:57:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1TyXc5-0006JT-Gy@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1TyXbw-0006HR-B9 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:57:40 +0000
Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1TyXbv-0006uC-EH for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:57:40 +0000
Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id o13so804093qaj.10 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:57:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MYS3KPCuh+iXDKWnZQbcVR1HQN/w2KBxSO8R6OPcZ40=; b=IFMZkbtVQOhvDWr809uEVia3thW5MuuGX1tgjliHjoW4TreBkA2B9BNeP86i9QdY6g y5DpzYrVl2eAFJzYT0NO1N3u1XSibmol2W+EPlcEVQK6s2mykoDeeT8aANMECsI6JkeB RMne/4BZxw1bJT0tXDJkChRl2mOTJq3gkemxZI9IsyYUbfEBV+PXHBDteJKOchzWlTSV 929QbAv457/XtLbpgJ1sEhEOfsDGGCCtx2+Bt70rS7lvCb53tcYEUBNvzkMHn4ND6zp2 ohTE+njHr/8Ae5Vx6P/+5ErWLOVgdph+exvhWmZIFG3ozULxoz8imrZtqcnDX3ewmPXB iX5Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MYS3KPCuh+iXDKWnZQbcVR1HQN/w2KBxSO8R6OPcZ40=; b=VPloD44ij0JKWI2psgq1U0Wb0SD2ZP57/KI2mYGYLKeK7uhPKPOJdNZvG4Uny6tjm8 C9Yp2Hc+lySewqI6c4txMT4L13EoSqjFbUSZUZCA2Xj/n4EsIx1tHqbtYg8ZA+STF4+n E5TbQQ6cAvFPu6NX0sWnOSehat28isXcaqhXk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=MYS3KPCuh+iXDKWnZQbcVR1HQN/w2KBxSO8R6OPcZ40=; b=XiOYRAjJDth6hEGZfHgLvaazuHUZwCfdRRPZnxDVpyGV1+IIz+heUH/0tM+mvzCsCW 1B4a4SdKiFY7NbJsqMl1woW3YgefKNWUItWDZjLQLaxDwyO7xYPJs9WRHbAcDa6epNCJ cBXd9T903b7sX/Y/2PVrTGwVhVtPlDMeQpv/bQDAy0CYaeQl/uCeXhLJZBKL8ec3Q2Xw p64eexoHS9vPY10bc/cQiK0v8MN7wjqQreRYVTizgMFOvv0Gd9c6q9O8dhcIv+/SBYBa UzhNk7pxZe2oeh2JGyB2JVBZa7Q67w6XaAEK8mZOSB5Z6ifmHnLgZLNVFIljg6+/fbFT RBDg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.198.22 with SMTP id em22mr992983qcb.2.1359075433517; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:57:13 -0800 (PST)
Sender: willchan@google.com
Received: by 10.229.57.163 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:57:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4WUYik1Yxmpqg3wnfa09xzR8nz7KiN3eP=tzoixP9gr3-=2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+LwgTSw05QLUspAbAyRSWfd8j27fhwPiDSF_TaD8LevftBA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_y2NEPLt=GkO575MfCi2aW4X+w40CzOVB05Z1+_rmLMXXSpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhJvSXgPzdqv2GscD-mfR4O7R_bba5JnAbdmP+uR+6SYA@mail.gmail.com> <510155E3.5020208@gmx.de> <CAMm+LwhCtd-m5uJnv+vcTTq9WcR3bEDQndV2cZqQE1ApNasCXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYh3uP228QKjMwtTT2QQb9ypijdHPY-CkZF36j6DuTH4+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgqYmwomf_3XFmqkS9bLTCEAaTt=f9bFuqhTfFzjFk3AQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYj3rDUQQ4crdyJrun=2-MwOGQ32qRfv5oJKrx=JciqOCA@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOhbOnCHCp7fKeG6QLKcdoYhAXcL1nkW6220+9xb-W5Gyw@mail.gmail.com> <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC302772111990734@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com> <CAP+FsNfB2WPkMTtjzVeJbuQPrz_srRm8ReGnx4WQi4LGmJ2Xzw@mail.gmail.com> <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC3027721119908B4@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com> <CAP+FsNe5hOQ=j7VGfUhfYUAj6p8dYiDE6hATtkUwahSi-89mJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwja9+LMwH8jdKYJqTheGKAHmWX+bCGkVUz3ocMKnjn1HQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNfAfdP3_0oZpozYr-+xaCpVUgS28uKXM1uG9VKOL9br8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNdaEAwJ1Dk=pA2-59X_eN9rg3ApdsAucVq91Keb_QXvtQ@mail.gmail.com> <F1962646D3B64642B7C9A06068EE1E64177CED56@ex10.hostedexchange.local> <CAA4WUYik1Yxmpqg3wnfa09xzR8nz7KiN3eP=tzoixP9gr3-=2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:57:13 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: awELUjgwoc8n3aSBXVN9Yrg1cnc
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYj5V9keihyCCcTbBthpcYXuO21UzcQAhFtQZ+FWDcKxaQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>
To: Robert Brewer <fumanchu@aminus.org>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmS5a3XrE/qRRkrhVHkGICbe21VqdFoGfRWZW9A4LxmDV7KJL9Tlhh68pYH2XXegIKcZjcL7jp/wIzclZcxENvLySH0aq82CJpznqReguXMWybBxd9OU7go3K1ppqb9K/b6HJEpJUifcdVkXTQJ/An6WoUkRSYcmtP0vvMTOkmuILTXPyC5vNPF26sb5JhypMRf1wir
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.44; envelope-from=willchan@google.com; helo=mail-qa0-f44.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.544, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1TyXbv-0006uC-EH bd3200897edae64066db8ae9b3a658d3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAA4WUYj5V9keihyCCcTbBthpcYXuO21UzcQAhFtQZ+FWDcKxaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16204
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

After reading Nico's reply, I realize I misunderstood your email.
Ignore my previous email.

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:49 PM, William Chan (陈智昌)
<willchan@chromium.org> wrote:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013JanMar/0357.html
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Robert Brewer <fumanchu@aminus.org> wrote:
>> Roberto Peon wrote:
>>> The worst part is the high latency, especially given TCP's
>>> current cogestion avoidance implementations-- the total number
>>> of round-trips ends up dominating latency, regardless of how
>>> much bandwidth one has.
>>
>> Why is this being addressed by trying to make the messages smaller? Wouldn't following the original architecture of HTTP, which was optimized for fewer, larger messages, also reduce latency?
>>
>>
>> Robert Brewer
>> fumanchu@aminus.org