Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT)
"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Sat, 05 March 2016 12:56 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F891B30A8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Mar 2016 04:56:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eb1cbpvdXLOE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Mar 2016 04:56:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 549ED1B30A3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Mar 2016 04:56:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1acBhO-0006Cu-4t for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 12:52:46 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1acBhO-0006Cu-4t@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1acBhH-0006C2-K1 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 12:52:39 +0000
Received: from raoul.w3.org ([128.30.52.128]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1acBhC-0007t0-7W for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 12:52:39 +0000
Received: from homard.platy.net ([80.67.176.7] helo=[192.168.1.40]) by raoul.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1acBhB-0009OV-HI for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 12:52:33 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Resent-From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 13:19:36 +0000
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org, Mike Bishop <michael.bishop@microsoft.com>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, michael.bishop@microsoft.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, shares@ndzh.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 13:52:28 +0100
Message-Id: <20160303131851.24634.26082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Name-Md5: efe3dad792d606410c9cc49cedaffc94
Resent-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, W3C_NW=0.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1acBhC-0007t0-7W 3ed22bb31c229c9caf0dd6087bb65947
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20160303131851.24634.26082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31192
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A clear sentence such as this one would have helped me: OLD: This specification defines a new concept in HTTP, "Alternative Services", that allows an origin server to nominate additional means of interacting with it on the network. NEW: This specification defines a new concept in HTTP, "Alternative Services", applicable to both HTTP 1.1 and HTTP 2.0, that allows an origin server to nominate additional means of interacting with it on the network. I overlooked this info in the following sentence, i.e. the fact that HTTP header = HTTP 1.1: It defines a general framework for this in Section 2, along with specific mechanisms for advertising their existence using HTTP header fields (Section 3) or HTTP/2 frames (Section 4), plus a way to indicate that an alternative service was used (Section 5).
- Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-ht… Mark Nottingham
- Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbi… Benoit Claise
- Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-ht… Benoit Claise