Re: http/2 flow control
Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 24 January 2013 22:32 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2903211E80BF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:32:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fTO9ZQhylpG1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:32:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A8B11E8099 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:32:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1TyVKy-00050g-Jr for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:32:00 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:32:00 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1TyVKy-00050g-Jr@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nico@cryptonector.com>) id 1TyVKt-0004zx-DT for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:31:55 +0000
Received: from caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.81] helo=homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nico@cryptonector.com>) id 1TyVKm-0001Vx-7P for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:31:55 +0000
Received: from homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D74943807E for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:31:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=LwYe9Cncc3+r7UNy5Jz2 vHpAR3M=; b=ijPLPr8dGxnoNdJN4nkluV/9lWUrerB/F4K8ttdHpoxKmYgF9ye+ cv1hICq6Rfat8ge3nktUQaREH8C4X0UhcyRYcNk11Cl09tWiFAA3V3JuhJb7cAw+ wmgbEwhnHgRHDuDDkM3Md463J7MNRZzp/HFbCj8OLfo8gydpcS7wUc0=
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F0E843806C for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hn14so916973wib.4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:31:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.99.227 with SMTP id et3mr5569431wib.6.1359066685804; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:31:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.39.133 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:31:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4WUYgk-NPZ0bdYV3KysVED=OqFQ6Z0eE-7ePmmFdS2GMfjLA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA4WUYgk-NPZ0bdYV3KysVED=OqFQ6Z0eE-7ePmmFdS2GMfjLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:31:25 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOiR11N0bW1Ac6=iLqsGzfFH+YLyjAmJCoPmJuruUQ3Dyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: none client-ip=208.97.132.81; envelope-from=nico@cryptonector.com; helo=homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.064, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1TyVKm-0001Vx-7P 6aaafc85ae3bf7bc57b9f15c428a3b42
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: http/2 flow control
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAK3OfOiR11N0bW1Ac6=iLqsGzfFH+YLyjAmJCoPmJuruUQ3Dyg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16189
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Quick question: is the flow control in SPDY 3 like SSHv2's? I.e., with per-flow window sizes advertised by the receiver? I ask because this has caused serious problems in the SSH world. I don't want HTTP/2.0 to make the same mistakes. Nico --
- http/2 flow control William Chan (陈智昌)
- Re: http/2 flow control Nico Williams
- Re: http/2 flow control Roberto Peon
- Re: http/2 flow control Nico Williams
- Re: http/2 flow control Mike Belshe