Re: Issues addressed in the -15 drafts
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 30 August 2011 11:44 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C758721F8C17 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.322, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zV3A8c20tthP for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2773721F8C12 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1QyMlG-0003Q0-4r for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:45:46 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1QyMl6-0003PA-Pe for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:45:36 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1QyMl4-0008Ka-G7 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:45:36 +0000
Received: from mnot-mini.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.37.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5326C22E256 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:45:13 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <72B25C02-6981-4071-BD60-1682E9890D2D@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:45:10 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8FE9B0D2-59C2-4595-B860-E929299982B7@mnot.net>
References: <72B25C02-6981-4071-BD60-1682E9890D2D@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1QyMl4-0008Ka-G7 3c8fa44733bce62370df5d5b34d7934d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Issues addressed in the -15 drafts
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/8FE9B0D2-59C2-4595-B860-E929299982B7@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/11275
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1QyMlG-0003Q0-4r@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:45:46 +0000
On 15/07/2011, at 5:38 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Please have a look; barring objections, I'll close the issues listed below. > > Issues are linked from <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/15>. > > * non-specific > #225 PUT side effect: invalidation or just stale? > #282 Recommend minimum sizes for protocol elements > > * p1-messaging > #273 HTTP-Version should be redefined as fixed length pair of DIGIT . DIGIT > #283 Set expectations around buffering > #288 Considering messages in isolation > > * p2-semantics > #255 Clarify status code for rate limiting I'm going to leave this open for now, since we have a draft (full disclosure: I'm an author) that might address this with a new status code that's being considered for the appawg. > #294 clarify 403 forbidden > #296 Clarify 203 Non-Authoritative Information > > * p6-cache > #38 Mismatch Vary > #235 Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses > #289 Proxies don't "understand" methods > #291 Cache Extensions can override no-store, etc. > #292 Pragma Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Issues addressed in the -15 drafts Mark Nottingham
- Re: Issues addressed in the -15 drafts Mark Nottingham