Re: Pipeline hinting revisited
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sat, 13 August 2011 07:42 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE39F21F863A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BpUlYvT6AzWi for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C4721F85F2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Qs8rl-0003VU-Uf for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 07:42:45 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Qs8rd-0003UZ-Ee for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 07:42:37 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Qs8rb-0008WT-13 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 07:42:37 +0000
Received: from mnot-mini.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.37.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEFE022E1EB; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 03:42:12 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <0AF7CCCA-CC03-43F2-A163-93C4847D19BA@gbiv.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:42:05 +1000
Cc: Brian Pane <brianp@brianp.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <9DA998D2-6A1D-450D-B0BE-043D48098DA8@mnot.net>
References: <CAAbTgTu2px+o=mFyEOuSW8KzHR-o5GeN9b6X-Q+VuRtQP=A0Qw@mail.gmail.com> <20110812053137.GC9902@1wt.eu> <CAP0-QpukAzexjJaMOHoTaAGRPYV_7-91Fr9P_ukkqNQ1gsDC_A@mail.gmail.com> <20110812055327.GE9902@1wt.eu> <4E44C61D.9030704@treenet.co.nz> <op.vz29ysx7kvaitl@lessa-ii> <4E452102.4080302@treenet.co.nz> <CAAbTgTvrf_qBe_ovtHnYpCSCusQ-Yhj5F=--R4zdFuDuPFHrag@mail.gmail.com> <0AF7CCCA-CC03-43F2-A163-93C4847D19BA@gbiv.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Qs8rb-0008WT-13 47a6ae3357ca5373d023297f03d924d0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Pipeline hinting revisited
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/9DA998D2-6A1D-450D-B0BE-043D48098DA8@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/11201
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Qs8rl-0003VU-Uf@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 07:42:45 +0000
On 13/08/2011, at 7:44 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > What might > work, without protocol changes, is to use a host or pathname > convention that says all of the resources on *this* site are > good for pipelining. Ugly as heck, but it would work well enough > for the use cases where pipelining helps the most (embedded stuff). ... or perhaps a persistent, out-of-band hint, in the style of: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-browser-hints -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Pipeline hinting revisited Brian Pane
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Willy Tarreau
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Darin Fisher
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Willy Tarreau
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Darin Fisher
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Amos Jeffries
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Willy Tarreau
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Yngve N. Pettersen
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Amos Jeffries
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Brian Pane
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Brian Pane
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Willy Tarreau
- Re: Pipeline hinting revisited Mark Nottingham