IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: FYI: Oblivious HTTP

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Thu, 28 January 2021 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E7F3A12A6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:26:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.672
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.672 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V28w3OPIn1s8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:26:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D7023A12A3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:26:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1l4zmD-0003RV-2m for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:23:29 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:23:29 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1l4zmD-0003RV-2m@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1l4zmB-0003Qf-Nd for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:23:27 +0000
Received: from [101.98.39.247] (helo=treenet.co.nz) by titan.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1l4zm9-0007k2-Q0 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:23:27 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.8] (unknown [121.98.62.26]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6D09830004A for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:23:07 +1300 (NZDT)
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <ef91fafb-1586-4076-baa9-033326162eb1@www.fastmail.com>
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Message-ID: <bd7a0cbf-ed31-7ce0-d6e2-808b026cb797@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:19:58 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ef91fafb-1586-4076-baa9-033326162eb1@www.fastmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=101.98.39.247; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1l4zm9-0007k2-Q0 bb0ff551d11ce4a2060b0967e90449cb
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: FYI: Oblivious HTTP
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/bd7a0cbf-ed31-7ce0-d6e2-808b026cb797@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38408
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 28/01/21 2:27 pm, Martin Thomson wrote:
> Just an announcement for a new draft that proposes a use of HTTP that this group might be interested in.  I've started a discussion on the SECDISPATCH list about it [1].  Please, if you are interested in this topic, join that conversation.
> 
> The draft:
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thomson-http-oblivious-00.html
> 

Looks to me like it should obsolete or at least deprecate RFC 2660.


AYJ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email