HTTP/2 status, IPR

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 15 December 2014 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7075B1A8FD2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:31:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e5nMknnxyDuw for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A1721A8F4D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Y0f2p-00085u-Cn for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:27:15 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:27:15 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Y0f2p-00085u-Cn@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Y0f2a-00082i-PN for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:27:00 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Y0f2Z-0000He-Pz for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:27:00 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.83] (unknown [118.209.197.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FBB550A84 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 18:26:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ADEBEA2F-C235-4130-84F5-A1553945E053@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:26:34 +1100
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.125, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Y0f2Z-0000He-Pz 9f3c391e7851f70de2475bbb20ecd98d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: HTTP/2 status, IPR
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/ADEBEA2F-C235-4130-84F5-A1553945E053@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28266
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Everyone,

I believe that the HTTP/2 and HPACK documents are ready for submission to the IESG. We have a small number of editorial issues that have been brought up since last review, but there will doubtless be other changes brought about by review; they can be incorporated then. I need to finish the shepherd's writeups, and then will be submitting the documents.

As part of that, I want to bring everyone's attention to the IPR declarations already made:

* Canon - https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2015/
* Google - https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1737/
* Microsoft - https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2122/

The Canon and Google declarations are required by the process, since their employees had personal knowledge of the declared IPR, and were document editors. My understanding is that these declarations are currently being updated to apply to our most current documents. 

The Google declaration has long been linked to the HTTP/2 document in the datatracker, so everyone should be aware of it already.

The Canon declaration was made against draft-ruellan-headerdiff, and I've just updated HPACK to indicate that it replaces that document in the datatracker (thereby linking in the declaration):
  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression/

If you haven't seen this declaration before, please have a look.

The Microsoft declaration was not required by the process, so I want to thank them for making it. If anyone else would like to make a declaration (hopefully with a generous license!), I would encourage them to do so.

Regards,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/