Re: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 29 March 2011 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BF43A694D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.389, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vdS2NC8OZG0u for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB8E3A67B7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Q4VKt-0006UI-Fw for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:35:39 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Q4VJV-0005D3-UO for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:34:13 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1Q4VJQ-0006Hy-DP for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:34:13 +0000
Received: from dhcp-57ae.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [130.129.87.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F252509DB; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:33:41 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <10881.1301391060@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:33:39 +0200
Cc: httpbis mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9F31297B-DED8-487C-AF5E-09442CCD9157@mnot.net>
References: <10881.1301391060@critter.freebsd.dk>
To: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Q4VJQ-0006Hy-DP a61d6765c6d44cefc502b32afe58f9ce
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/9F31297B-DED8-487C-AF5E-09442CCD9157@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/10291
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Q4VKt-0006UI-Fw@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:35:39 +0000

Sitting here with Roy, who's asking much the same question. James, I know there was a discussion about this a while back, but it's new to many; can you give an overview?

Cheers,


On 29/03/2011, at 11:31 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <B27105DD-AFD1-451C-B9D7-ED79888A657B@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri
> tes:
> 
>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt
> 
> Couldt we please try to make it a habit to include some kind of use-case
> or justification for these "bolt-on" drafts ?
> 
> It's probably my imagination that is flawed, but the only mental connection
> I can attach to this draft is RFC748, so somebody please explain:
> 
> 1. Whats the point.
> 
> 2. How dows this help.
> 
> 3. How much will it help.
> 
> Poul-Henning
> 
> -- 
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/