Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop
Martijn Faassen <faassen@startifact.com> Tue, 19 August 2014 10:39 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA181A8896 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m-nynN4piZsl for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58AC21A03BF for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XJglx-0002SP-Ad for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:36:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:36:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XJglx-0002SP-Ad@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martijn.faassen@gmail.com>) id 1XJgld-0002Rc-Kl for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:35:53 +0000
Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.219.43]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martijn.faassen@gmail.com>) id 1XJglc-0005PM-CB for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:35:53 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i7so5056703oag.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TccM0e5w8nHi3bR/3eXbZtnt/Q5Mb20gX17vuf7g2Dg=; b=lwGgqPBvIKGvwHy590ivMssgACPF/nROmPdsm67d3/8soA7mnpQATlS2VCh7tapJvG 0aiZiFgFB5CDoFXnF4BOX+2x4/5kASGmRF7xA9lpJzVe8At3q+nKiGHcJ7EWbjyk3Vsw ANlJfqaChIw6T0WAiNLovtfTTEJrW6CaqKFpo/a4sfiq7TAJaBhEPbzrF4MVsymmAKe3 R0Dk0oQ1ZlMd50qva6pm0AcaePfoLd8bFz+1vfuN01vUwMX7NL53zWOIVUSp7DRwNSuq kV2pXW1irKdQ8Ge32xrmN+BjLpDCHPD7bEDRUnI0vwZxQ0bxRrwsNGemJ8wxXso4vo1c EGpw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.71.104 with SMTP id t8mr8715392obu.71.1408444526136; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: martijn.faassen@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.106.99 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53F31646.3060801@treenet.co.nz>
References: <CAGT4ZFhOmN6N9zT0Z=edx6_kMUPczOc4zVNjQzDk5Bw3DFjtww@mail.gmail.com> <CAGT4ZFjt__Ct2n06gWJ5A2yLU0ZjTkSR19JG02PJ0W4SzRr=nQ@mail.gmail.com> <53F2E29D.7070506@treenet.co.nz> <CAGT4ZFjz52EesnhE9g4d-B4-XRKgioMaHetXOpyeBtgstpDHsQ@mail.gmail.com> <53F31646.3060801@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:35:26 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: iMSjtIKU4UFYr3FRErQZ5a0L590
Message-ID: <CAGT4ZFhpMRstAZH=NHHo_yLHj7N7MUtgz6ahUwCHRQrojrLufg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martijn Faassen <faassen@startifact.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.43; envelope-from=martijn.faassen@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f43.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.451, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XJglc-0005PM-CB 42a72ae9701e9764abe44967adff386d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGT4ZFhpMRstAZH=NHHo_yLHj7N7MUtgz6ahUwCHRQrojrLufg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26651
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hey, Thanks, this is helping my comprehension. I've written up a blog post describing the relation between the new HTTP 1.1 RFCs and Python WSGI spec here: http://blog.startifact.com/posts/new-http-rfcs-versus-wsgi.html Hopefully I didn't get it too wrong. I'll bring up this post to the Python web special interest group too. Thanks again! Regards, Martijn
- updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop Martijn Faassen
- Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop Martijn Faassen
- Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop Amos Jeffries
- Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop Martijn Faassen
- Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop Amos Jeffries
- Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop Martijn Faassen
- Re: updated http 1.1 rfcs and hop-by-hop Roy T. Fielding