IETF Logo Mail Archive

#225: JFV Revisited

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 11 August 2016 04:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE69A12D0F0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 21:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KQbWKBAslld7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 21:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94357126579 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 21:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bXhzW-0004eo-Mo for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 04:53:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 04:53:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bXhzW-0004eo-Mo@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1bXhzN-0004e1-Lu for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 04:53:05 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1bXhzL-0004pL-LO for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 04:53:04 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [124.189.98.244]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C238422E255; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:52:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 14:52:36 +1000
Message-Id: <64A60DE8-C2DD-4F61-89D7-EF5449E1F29E@mnot.net>
Cc: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.081, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bXhzL-0004pL-LO 1a047be2dda6ba00fe1befb2f5ecb524
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: #225: JFV Revisited
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/64A60DE8-C2DD-4F61-89D7-EF5449E1F29E@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32251
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

For those not following the issues list closely, Ilya is wondering whether browsers' implementation of ECMA-262 changes things for JFV:

  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/225

Thoughts (here or there)?

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email