IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Questions on Frame Size

Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp> Sat, 22 June 2013 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE87E21F9C75 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwmx3LvmZ7eK for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3BB21E804B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UqDFI-0008Uh-0e for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 02:08:08 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 02:08:08 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UqDFI-0008Uh-0e@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>) id 1UqDF4-0008TQ-AL for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 02:07:54 +0000
Received: from mo00.iij.ad.jp ([202.232.30.145] helo=omgo.iij.ad.jp) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>) id 1UqDF3-0005yA-3m for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 02:07:54 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iij.ad.jp; h=Message-ID: Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; i=ohtsu@iij.ad.jp; s=omgo1; t=1371866849; x= 1373076449; bh=1y1GA9YCET6EIMZQ/2mI9V0hZmwntCMyREUZR5v8NWk=; b=mnyvBF6tykUpN3G9 yHyth96sziG9/rAg9gZMDgGV5DVlHiVy/ghWIXu+o5jJ8PFbTlS5SygSfCZsccHUTVqg9u2U2hiQ+ nEC5pWbw+EkEfKmkdreqacVGPwoA5azT6p3CrnBSrsho/3aDAetDSNUSQw9BACLxAhOvPOouRxrJ8 U=;
Received: by omgo.iij.ad.jp (mo00) id r5M27TDt003601; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:07:29 +0900
Message-ID: <51C506DD.9040806@iij.ad.jp>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:07:25 +0900
From: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <51C293FD.1040806@iij.ad.jp> <CABP7RbeS7zeVnOM7R0mcUe+t-M+Ta3GVZr+1A3gSjY8QqCOgzQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C3823E.7010706@iij.ad.jp> <51C3A2A4.6030601@treenet.co.nz> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1306201809370.21683@egate.xpasc.com> <51C3BD06.6020501@iij.ad.jp> <CAA4WUYjJoxfmuU8GKySeCmoF4-T-BYC1YmBHRTc36su5eubNuQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C3CE2C.5080807@iij.ad.jp> <CABkgnnXkNbOBCb6D56pFBhxLQVvhKKVSyAf8VCRkM3L4WPFneA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXkNbOBCb6D56pFBhxLQVvhKKVSyAf8VCRkM3L4WPFneA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=202.232.30.145; envelope-from=ohtsu@iij.ad.jp; helo=omgo.iij.ad.jp
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.688, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.522, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UqDF3-0005yA-3m 2829f6abaef0fe9be4b9f608a131c7f4
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Questions on Frame Size
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51C506DD.9040806@iij.ad.jp>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18350
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

(2013/06/22 3:10), Martin Thomson wrote:
> I've made a few changes.  Let me know if the current spec is somehow inadequate.

Having a new subsection of "Frame Size Limits for HTTP" is good
as it's not redundant. Thanks.

Sometime later, we will need to change the description to
allow reuse of the frame layer for non-HTTP.

Regards,

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email