[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7725 (5512)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 02 October 2018 00:18 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A431274D0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RuwIeDR4A1L for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DDB9126CB6 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1g78Ll-0004kE-T9 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 00:15:41 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 00:15:41 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1g78Ll-0004kE-T9@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1g78Lk-0004jb-Ls for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 00:15:40 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1g78Lj-0004g3-7l for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 00:15:40 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9E0B1B82726; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
To: tbray@textuality.com, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, mnot@mnot.net, patrick.ducksong@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: curtself.cs@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20181002001509.9E0B1B82726@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 17:15:09 -0700
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.985, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1g78Lj-0004g3-7l 6dc94d2371e63078cd802710afa678cf
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7725 (5512)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20181002001509.9E0B1B82726@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35937
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7725, "An HTTP Status Code to Report Legal Obstacles". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5512 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Curt Self <curtself.cs@gmail.com> Section: 3 Original Text ------------- Note that in many cases clients can still access the denied resource by using technical countermeasures such as a VPN or the Tor network. Corrected Text -------------- (remove the sentence) Notes ----- I understand that the status code itself is kind of a joke (Fahrenheit 451), but the sentence above seems to have no place in a technical document. It provides no insight into use cases for either a client or implementing software. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7725 (draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04) -------------------------------------- Title : An HTTP Status Code to Report Legal Obstacles Publication Date : February 2016 Author(s) : T. Bray Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7725 (5512) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7725 (5512) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7725 (5512) Tim Bray
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7725 (5512) Adam Roach
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7725 (5512) Julian Reschke