IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ref to draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-07, was: Re-WGLC for BCP65bis

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 19 April 2021 07:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4093A250C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.871
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.871 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=XNytB+Qb; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=dc8DOhVa
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8H4axhLetgVH for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C0F13A250A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1lYOFc-0000sr-Sr for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:23:20 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:23:20 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1lYOFc-0000sr-Sr@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1lYOFb-0000s5-F6 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:23:19 +0000
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1lYOFZ-0007UV-Sm for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:23:19 +0000
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F8D13B3; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:23:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:23:06 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=X sJt4A0qBqz1jsZ1mhta+d5ZBHX+oZlxMURkt3tSC0c=; b=XNytB+QbmRXqOK2g1 qWKyQlTBX60FQ4WG6zr3V/nuSBkTGJgz6fAZfs7QVTc5S9W1lXZZkycsTUk8eyeh Dywa33GHlS6dwVUdRkR4oB+8LCL7YYjQMbHSfPLN8T0jpRMdBGYCIGqhUkTEFhPu rE1reUOcaWVyxoyOhJgdPaUqxhQiEREPHnxk3bXAP0DU5W265KC/WfbHaCRJ2N4w JepVyCAjVRpc/csN+P8wMHnQYHiDmVFGtCVSt0/UzPa/t1xDSxdCVPfTlll4TAQx nfAYDA7aeyXvLIgkbdP0aroD8V7wb3dd9kv0FlhgrmbvbhoCD3wgudx3fGf2KIa1 mWxnw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=XsJt4A0qBqz1jsZ1mhta+d5ZBHX+oZlxMURkt3tSC 0c=; b=dc8DOhVaD8HiEsImBL2g/jOaztSY4hdcPZWcbi5XOBrpc1eZUnpUwJxsg hI2FN6Hi9TEXjbk3dTlNfg18vwa2f9kq9vBiggZTOeKaX39rRxcGFLcQ95u+3sC5 tfkVGja38hjQrePW4AkKcL47KjhUTQHJg1uwKQJ73DJ31P9MCe05ueZYkCTXK7ht RYqMXTaLo+LYFpHqnc9WM5ZgTXavb9pmn7Yik0DiD2hjgEa0UDKskThjOB6KUO5Q qq6D1mDANNHMpyjwtvLH4Oq4THC1rQhh8VotWybDojVx7RV0LPtvOiKNs5MoB6Fk z2FxgY25fE6zJdmbBPna3B3UHZtSQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2C99YPnB2zW5jc8p4JqeGz3R82JPw8xwwIdFwhjNG8lrqaOg6sEKZw> <xme:2C99YHI4-7t_qlhmJog0A2sHvQrhP7DZB0dVddu3XJlWZ8GmIaEEsv56ULO-wBULy MWowROISbP9NFZ0Vw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddtfedgudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeelffdvueevffffkeeggfffueegheelkeekteejlefhleekveekudeiieevvdet gfenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepud duledrudejrdduheekrddvhedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:2C99YEwnWn-g3iB_bV1-g3l2tqgmAZipIqmKDPog60gGSpwiZQygrw> <xmx:2C99YPv6kgwDTe-a50WMP-uKwMLPkBh_-vqk4mt_ooVa1J40FFJSIQ> <xmx:2C99YDtn9KWza9RdShjxDEjR7jCknrgyw3w-jGtHADEwvdo6gqOJuw> <xmx:2S99YP7EftCjnqMzLiFmFXzzb8X31wc8zMQ4tvxXTqCErrFEVg39Sw>
Received: from marks-air.mnot.net (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 04D4A1080068; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:23:02 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <334e8902-881a-e482-03ea-c47c5de2941d@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:23:00 +1000
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EE544BC6-1938-4E29-B8D4-C4DBD1EA467E@mnot.net>
References: <3BE0DB7F-1EDD-4953-BEB4-0F1B843C7EEA@apple.com> <334e8902-881a-e482-03ea-c47c5de2941d@gmx.de>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.25; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=mnot.net), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=messagingengine.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1lYOFZ-0007UV-Sm 6bebce0439450b0979dbdbc55cbe668b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: ref to draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-07, was: Re-WGLC for BCP65bis
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/EE544BC6-1938-4E29-B8D4-C4DBD1EA467E@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38709
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I tend to agree; updated in <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/223a67e086>.

(if the bis effort speeds up, we can always update in AUTH48).



> On 7 Apr 2021, at 5:35 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Am 01.04.2021 um 19:31 schrieb Tommy Pauly:
>> ...
> 
> The draft currently refers to draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-07, for
> which it's not really clear when we'll be done with it.
> 
> Are we ok with *this* document sitting in the RFC Publication Queue
> until it is ready? Otherwise it might be wise to reference RFC 6265
> instead...
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email