Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-01.txt
Mike West <mkwst@google.com> Tue, 25 April 2017 11:07 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E5312EBCB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.24 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jhhbhMzbkDjy for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0DAC12EBC9 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1d2yHq-0007br-Fi for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:05:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:05:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1d2yHq-0007br-Fi@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mkwst@google.com>) id 1d2yHk-0007ax-3x for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:05:32 +0000
Received: from mail-yw0-f181.google.com ([209.85.161.181]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mkwst@google.com>) id 1d2yHc-0000ev-BV for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:05:26 +0000
Received: by mail-yw0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 203so91028739ywe.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7es0lIl4wNWFrrNTOcwDWl6qaM4Q6pLgNHriLEbzKDs=; b=unxY19GRALnB/hy7UL63rZT/Rpmv1YiIvKV5gTcABS7uIWgJdp9Er+1giu7/QacS9V WA6KKyaMTsx7kvUFi6p52OTksyQl7bboBTzf+BlwstUPBQQC0kAI6q7DwfGQCWmXpS4s K5LQKYN0HgfJVsl+hwXGRONwk+c7mHGK4htbDnNNn6/JduCQ1twXWWIJhNEVdJnASzz/ GSokjJvxTBEHg/15P4UD731kJ5UjLOq4To7UlTCnw1W3lecMmv9hBh5ktrlAWcforCZU JHDyPrwrtXYNivzbqSCmfycqeG5zTmUggpQe7vthwIbBGboMTkAZi+mWRWmx/Ao54Ane wOYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=7es0lIl4wNWFrrNTOcwDWl6qaM4Q6pLgNHriLEbzKDs=; b=VAMRoWMVtYjHVe9fCW4/P4/rH8U1+RtdpB3jGKAC16s05K5BziG86SKfgU6y6JwjRr s4WywWCiKzqX5CN7PXXjO6lmIjEa0n7h+zC0vnzi5UlKQ+G/eRwvNLfRCxR6FtDnpOqR laYr+AkJeJ6feKEL0hqvnSD3mx/0UEmpMI9WaAPplJy8S/1kYeJ3yKHkPCtJGDTejegw PpyNEWSWvpRPa8h5iMd0JzJB8e4OQg/aBFQk6rql2ZocpVj1eSy2/YFgXOVeFRNsGluC iHKvMozvQX666Q0xzkNel9oZTmOPCQ2fV6RpxAthBBbinbvpQfKnPkRYcPS4VSdb2Ak/ SYeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7+5naSEdJPgC7J0A6vbpaRXEIQntSqWRWYlfSbiTbxG0gWQ9mQ 8L8kdBgejfrKTR4AbfxKxELZNsyISHMhZsc=
X-Received: by 10.129.49.132 with SMTP id x126mr8956982ywx.227.1493118297612; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.109.65 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKXHy=e6UUd1ogOB9EVbJUcv-9ZyUxcFZecJxemNmCSh5iUSEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <149311408863.5954.15477072413804974508@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKXHy=e6UUd1ogOB9EVbJUcv-9ZyUxcFZecJxemNmCSh5iUSEw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:04:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKXHy=dcxMKRhYvik_KzUrxGTEOGTNN3=We3Z+nU0bHXZBOp7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11420582bd4f4c054dfbb161"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.161.181; envelope-from=mkwst@google.com; helo=mail-yw0-f181.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.139, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1d2yHc-0000ev-BV 7ded3e4a5085745a3e164fed86b419e5
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-01.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKXHy=dcxMKRhYvik_KzUrxGTEOGTNN3=We3Z+nU0bHXZBOp7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33838
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
(Dropping announcement lists, sorry for the noise. :( ) -mike On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > Following up on the discussion at the last meeting, I've revived the > RFC6265bis draft, pulling in both https://tools.ietf.org/ > html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-alone-01 and https://tools.ietf.org/ > html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-prefixes-00. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-same-site-00 is > going to take a little bit longer, as I think some pieces of it really need > to live in Fetch as opposed to the RFC. I'll work on that separation, and > try to address the remaining issues > <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A6265bis> > before the next meeting in July so that we have something concrete to > discuss in that venue. > > In any event, now's a good time to file bugs, if you're so inclined. :) > > -mike > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:54 AM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol of the IETF. >> >> Title : HTTP State Management Mechanism >> Authors : Adam Barth >> Mike West >> Filename : draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-01.txt >> Pages : 40 >> Date : 2017-04-25 >> >> Abstract: >> This document defines the HTTP Cookie and Set-Cookie header fields. >> These header fields can be used by HTTP servers to store state >> (called cookies) at HTTP user agents, letting the servers maintain a >> stateful session over the mostly stateless HTTP protocol. Although >> cookies have many historical infelicities that degrade their security >> and privacy, the Cookie and Set-Cookie header fields are widely used >> on the Internet. This document obsoletes RFC 2965. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis/ >> >> There are also htmlized versions available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-01 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-01 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-01 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> >> >
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-01.… Mike West
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-01.… Mike West
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-01.txt internet-drafts
- draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-01, 4.1.3.1. The "_… Kari Hurtta