Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7744)

sequpt <sequpt@protonmail.com> Thu, 04 January 2024 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C500CC14F711 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:34:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: invalid data)" header.d=w3.org header.b="COZt1jUs"; dkim=neutral (2048-bit key) reason="invalid (signature is expired)" header.d=protonmail.com header.b="TdssyMVs"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oa-cnBYWcSCS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:34:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E282C14F6A0 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:34:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1rLTSg-00EoSQ-Dq for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:33:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1rLTSg-00EoSQ-Dq@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <sysbot+mod@w3.org>) id 1rLTSe-00EoPX-Nm for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:33:00 +0000
Received: from lyra.w3.org ([128.30.52.18]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <sysbot+mod@w3.org>) id 1rLTSe-00EJuz-Dk for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:33:00 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w3.org; s=s1; h=Subject:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: Cc:From:To:Date; bh=fSDMPz9D060/TegLo+Vc2tRUvjRDMaSAOfoLYbyLRII=; b=COZt1jUsI mG/NJ332o1/5vAXar7sN2ANiI0wouJmAFckIMk52XS44K9eqGjC96QxjS+pQN3yLbPPhT3tPQB36Y gSPUSDy3gy2aGjA3AaA9Ydy7DxxA8FJ1SmfdGE+uXsKlgzvsCHIFymuMNF2n/cHWwTBhZepWiL2rD PqoDaqCakszKOYqbOMVBG/3QOaAACkb9SHlXvbXgLufXvldjNdb5kDvs8L1MTxhxab74rx/RSt/sx Bl8omMbCVR7V9nlTBo52yGO1pj1njA6tGbF1XP1eLztsYVtGMgjoH6wWLJ20jo83TDgdB9zxTNDfQ dbH4CwvyKqTIvzehqk7YZrNuw==;
Received: from www-data by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <sysbot+mod@w3.org>) id 1rLTSe-00EoP7-4F for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:33:00 +0000
Resent-From: List moderator <sysbot+mod@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:33:00 +0000
Received: from www-data by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <sequpt@protonmail.com>) id 1rLEY7-00DD1N-Gu for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 03:37:39 +0000
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <sequpt@protonmail.com>) id 1rJt36-006BBH-Qe for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 10:28:04 +0000
Received: from mail-4324.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.24]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <sequpt@protonmail.com>) id 1rJt33-00CjKn-VV for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 10:28:04 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1704018475; x=1704277675; bh=fSDMPz9D060/TegLo+Vc2tRUvjRDMaSAOfoLYbyLRII=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=TdssyMVsn7piQMg4Lxdx1xlyprgV+s4nCN74cfrtgy08KMqOqtix9ejceLGIUt2Pq kwzCwXBj0HyfxHVRAQ5AjFpxssm4yjf53NOyvFZSb3zkIPg9MGQ63z68YqYoHUlcRv mFOtDJumBY0xifNwS4K3b4A0wuv8giE86zHbxaMIyHyrAaXLb3ADGhLeSHAS5ikpB3 xX+X4WTwYmxI66Dn6Uobv/QQbMVm8smFnATgex6gjizHk/qGbdjNH2aJ/YbgO1h5nu stNMkGOHa5n4L/BWFUqJKTv8XtxlXXuoP40khXOagLGR3j01PEWPTqyAZoizFFSb5/ bAKB0p1F/9ybw==
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 10:27:32 +0000
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
From: sequpt <sequpt@protonmail.com>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <7pHvk6viBH3r36G55HOFhEtOk0EyyXCEQZwbTvp8t5fkwCJDuzdM92T-_OCRhQrgm6JKKaUk28qaQP_TNE3-Gpy8RL01yfsakEHIhEaIEXQ=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5F0E81D2-3984-4A58-A10D-4DAA92E0F466@mnot.net>
References: <20231231095249.521BD1BA3E97@rfcpa.amsl.com> <5F0E81D2-3984-4A58-A10D-4DAA92E0F466@mnot.net>
Feedback-ID: 52575059:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; boundary="------b697b2adc48f68108b01963cc89e7babe1cca8724d877058070b1c69f343d2c1"; charset="utf-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.24; envelope-from=sequpt@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4324.protonmail.ch
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=sequpt@protonmail.com domain=protonmail.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_NW=1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1rJt33-00CjKn-VV ad350cf8982def34c14e8e00e89d1fbc
X-caa-id: 2e5f71eec5
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7744)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/7pHvk6viBH3r36G55HOFhEtOk0EyyXCEQZwbTvp8t5fkwCJDuzdM92T-_OCRhQrgm6JKKaUk28qaQP_TNE3-Gpy8RL01yfsakEHIhEaIEXQ=@protonmail.com>
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/51708
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/email/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello and thanks for the quick answer.
The [HTTP] reference in RFC9112 links to https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9110 and in every version available that I can access at this URL, 5.5 is the section where 'obs-text' is defined. 5.6.3 is 'Whitespace'. This is the first errata I submit, am I missing something important?


On Sunday, December 31st, 2023 at 9:58 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:


> This should be 5.6.3, not .4 or 5.5.
>
> > On 31 Dec 2023, at 8:52 pm, RFC Errata System rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> >
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9112,
> > "HTTP/1.1".
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7744
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Editorial
> > Reported by: sequpt sequpt@protonmail.com
> >
> > Section: 1.2
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> > obs-text = <obs-text, see [HTTP], Section 5.6.4>
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> > obs-text = <obs-text, see [HTTP], Section 5.5>
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> > 'obs-text' is used in the rules defined in 5.6.4 but is only defined in 5.5.
> > This error also appears in 'Appendix A. Collected ABNF'
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
> > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC9112 (draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-19)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title : HTTP/1.1
> > Publication Date : June 2022
> > Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
> > Category : INTERNET STANDARD
> > Source : HTTP
> > Area : Applications and Real-Time
> > Stream : IETF
> > Verifying Party : IESG
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/