Re: bohe implementation for compression tests

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Thu, 17 January 2013 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652CF21F8634 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:42:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.291, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31rXywlU1zCH for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:42:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD9221F8633 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:42:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1TveUe-0005Vr-EM for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 01:42:12 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 01:42:12 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1TveUe-0005Vr-EM@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1TveUb-0005Ul-8n for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 01:42:09 +0000
Received: from mail-ia0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1TveUa-0007K9-Jx for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 01:42:09 +0000
Received: by mail-ia0-f173.google.com with SMTP id l29so267785iag.32 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:41:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mD/aLHM2UZRcpf8uWx6CwRAz2i3mRQWUiS9MrXpf5gs=; b=wXR//2dA1Eoazm1dkNPytjxz3lp+dkX9ir6sufRFznfM+7aEP+7WXwqdURyAn2chGl u5rF0YboRIMXCA4PTEk36UL3yukjMA56+7TjRZRFFi0qClME7Z9hTv2QLD6QSBQDy5M/ E6v8YcIp8zFU0ng+9/EzNH4Op977Z4D6N167oPFEw2gFFBNqc0+uZG+9S5IN0cd3km+I 5t77aGyo+jxlOWPpwoB9CFIlYCLBsGBmspRjjLNpXeKhKj7q+mkKjUtdjyUeJmyoG8oZ oiEt47k3AsQAKC8BdOksqiTeMXMSmtvFhIL9oDZFbUDbPjWt53aPs+YnO/vhjqmw7Gnh yPZQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.6.230 with SMTP id e6mr1046395iga.3.1358386902561; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:41:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.73.8 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:41:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUrs19_73Xc=E+TAhnP6AEdmuKQ5-XmDez+mJg-MONZfA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7Rbe-B89vVm8=OnHtAG0Y3G2UOysX+DKaTQ3+rAKBJBJyKA@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbdSurNdLxvVV1F-9Bx4LwdhrX2btEvfA+RV=rVZ0moXNA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVdXwo5eiBMNMjONG88r8EvErxQ9_yrgdh5NFH=KQhfZQ@mail.gmail.com> <B8C9ED58-31E8-4DF0-9AE0-34E07B95F0A8@mnot.net> <CABkgnnUrs19_73Xc=E+TAhnP6AEdmuKQ5-XmDez+mJg-MONZfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:41:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNf65e57gO_o00fCDNnSKHPT6WTNge0Pp-kROnrgZT+RbA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f646b35cb752004d372186b"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.173; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-ia0-f173.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.600, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1TveUa-0007K9-Jx 43aff0e0984638cb80b208cfa19b8488
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: bohe implementation for compression tests
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAP+FsNf65e57gO_o00fCDNnSKHPT6WTNge0Pp-kROnrgZT+RbA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/15948
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

The difference is, well huge, and not only linear, though it arguably could
be made to be merely linearly different :)

Which reminds me, pypi has a module that makes huffman encoding/decoding
very cheap (and I'd get to throw away a file).
Any opinions on using/including it? It'd require getting it installed on
machines (on ubuntu, just an apt-get away...)
-=R


On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 16 January 2013 17:11, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> > Getting there, although you may need a small truck to haul the grain of
> salt that will accompany it...
>
> Even if it just means running the sample set n times using 'time', it
> would be nice to get ballpark figures.  Even if the errors are
> enormous.  For instance, a python implementation of delta is probably
> not that good to compare to an optimized gzip implementation, but it
> might still let us know that deltav3 is better than deltav2.
>
>