Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT

"J.C. Jones" <jc@mozilla.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 01:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028C4129EEB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:30:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4qMzlm0nJPMA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD6D2129C32 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cHKpR-0008VF-2m for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:27:25 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:27:25 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cHKpR-0008VF-2m@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <jjones@mozilla.com>) id 1cHKpC-0008SJ-Ic for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:27:10 +0000
Received: from mail-qk0-f181.google.com ([209.85.220.181]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <jjones@mozilla.com>) id 1cHKp6-0002je-73 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:27:05 +0000
Received: by mail-qk0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x190so41381386qkb.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:26:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=80xfLXLW01EYjpzHF/CucbyczEjjnlmv2fo8MFoHoRE=; b=WV31jKpJFjuOV+UJeDYFkAekR1dzAOdZzfy37yJk8Id1BBTsfruWDzgdXm+tPxq8R0 azJjgIZDtEd00euo/vD3km5qVAXQ5ZCwxxSgAooWH8yIytSi+9U6o4G1VSp9GEI9bQUN 3K/lpKqec+nCRfb+sdCTcq+od6DtIMcTFi4+U=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=80xfLXLW01EYjpzHF/CucbyczEjjnlmv2fo8MFoHoRE=; b=iYq8TGK1xcIIz8ks3thZy2cTdWxkzc2KNh/xitBct9Y6O8MyPONMjyHe9KIHsasHqA NAZ7ixvlCfOa5S04KIYqtali6+RPGD9sIA5YuHl349EWsDzS6a+WayQKPHhLCy3817as G6aMu6vr9FanEQnUi72btLuRwfcIjRIl2k6tPxkVJJsCFh9NFskj8fnwuWymuaHJkEBn 7+F79Op+1r3tQorC84IeHt9oHqi1bHD4HRv/nJBIXVbkfF9TuGsEdcflpSuKl+oCUwTf 7SY9A7RtqW8DNWRPnHWsgN2YPn61N0Lpt7Bdrsn2te6ZXWocL9OaePU1w+rpy1lX/50y 5bnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC028Rxi6TGYY1yxzBpUe4Bx4BTIDWnpGGJ3qJ96RU66ILGVvWds8pCYHu9Vlk0NsUJGQyU/WIoK2WRJTqmlz
X-Received: by 10.55.80.198 with SMTP id e189mr39922991qkb.222.1481765197624; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:26:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.146.177 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:26:17 -0800 (PST)
From: "J.C. Jones" <jc@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:26:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAObDDPDzrzr7=Tyqk23jjG-gnXrtpru7jdp+QSfErVsn60gOYQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a6f023ed3560543a858db
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.181; envelope-from=jjones@mozilla.com; helo=mail-qk0-f181.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.260, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cHKp6-0002je-73 d38028c245101c3a8a8eeff80e7cc1ba
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAObDDPDzrzr7=Tyqk23jjG-gnXrtpru7jdp+QSfErVsn60gOYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33198
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Better late than never...

On 2016/12/08 13:05, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Again, there seemed to be strong support in Seoul, and now on the list, for adopting this draft:
>
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-stark-expect-ct>
>
> Please comment / express support on list.

The Security Engineering team at Mozilla is interested in implementing
Expect-CT in Firefox in 2017. I believe this view was communicated in
person but, as I wasn't there, I want to be sure it's recorded properly.

Expect-CT primarily gives us a method to allow website operators to start
testing the as-of-now-unspecified Firefox CT policy across the variety of
end-user environments, and get some feedback as to whether their CDN /
Webserver combination is distributing SCTs properly.

Cheers,

J.C.
Security Engineering, Mozilla