Re: Adoption call for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Tue, 08 February 2022 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5F63A0F09 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 07:46:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HYUB0sWBDM4L for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 07:46:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA6A83A0D41 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 07:46:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1nHSfK-00045R-77 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 15:44:26 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 15:44:26 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1nHSfK-00045R-77@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1nHSfI-00044R-Of for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 15:44:24 +0000
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1nHSfG-0006in-Oa for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 15:44:24 +0000
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id w14so38356314edd.10 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 07:44:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1xqmRhoJIQGTIvTNLXI7weNrUKVsSiuewzE1ryzU2wA=; b=j2ewrXkzBwmEce3WjvFyhTSZrhWes/0bkBJn8j2RGTRR8iMI/CcSjtTCEzQDR5RQUt GuUa/DKMCKAlO8ifJQkZ2ti8bxlA5+GlZhwBV9FHdoAtLl+1bDwRhQ2JS2WaW2IH/Ly3 +zgGF07kJxwVN1/tvVXGjfM8uLcXDwmBBKdPjHoe9Fo4Tn91dA+z9c0Cuh4cQ0E9YcGP VCl60DLVcvZXfxkKbWvBYbPoJZJ6CwgmWpWfZcOycBYxcNnU1LLs4qs9+/fdFslK0gWG UMEy/AaQ/QGjWU1ZRErDgAn6mkDmIlGvS5qB4duio6vveOMH317Eiz3lRuIPJofcivNd s51A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1xqmRhoJIQGTIvTNLXI7weNrUKVsSiuewzE1ryzU2wA=; b=nKTmHztSQesdC9/2PLHq3E7NqJIH6G1NqiI4Nq+KEwJXrDFq3hTa3QvhaxLKMUoSKR GIlFZOsJ3Tf5fLAXKYch4bpaxIbOk5qi4KaxvnxN319jr3UPYoL3UR9vDvEc27EYXwog HpPGaex8oFlUGFa3qZ5RpGvfF09Cd+oq9+T8kW0xF4oSLsQwVwcekgX82eZjyLvCxsAl A1GciknckTfICIyJMP5jXdGeK7fxvejtDOqdsNGGCTT245VB1Idyi4QRUw4Hs07ZtkYE HeSguI7IeNTnu16181L1TZ6/igSg6c8JfmKlmBq2bKsmueUp4mt/Ro8zAaeOBOPxnHQX S8hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533p3orCtFBExDPD9mmN3SdMqIlDk3NrQDxz327J9nL6SZHKH8Of f25cpzCPoP2Nz8lcDkbru0BMHtp43aZQSicZYD7io8ES
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDYVcOUF1UqkKsGbcEu35L4U0TMXzMIfgddySiYENS4KTaJK2h2fNu+wRj5EUyLTKb/ogtTDB2y/1b4YtQS6M=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:607:: with SMTP id n7mr5147349edv.205.1644335051302; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 07:44:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <95859F6E-F16F-458D-8275-94232FAFA1B8@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <95859F6E-F16F-458D-8275-94232FAFA1B8@apple.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 15:43:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oaM-uokdTvU1JMCVz6Oi9ZBG4LMCLwf6PqWFy08Yw3CLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009fe7f905d7839680"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::530; envelope-from=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x530.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com domain=gmail.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1nHSfG-0006in-Oa 91eff3ba4f4763f112170e25bd9cb066
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Adoption call for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9oaM-uokdTvU1JMCVz6Oi9ZBG4LMCLwf6PqWFy08Yw3CLA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/39825
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I support adoption.

If it were to be adopted, I think it would be useful to formalize the
inclusion criteria because there's a lot of non-SF headers out there. It
might also be useful to understand how implementation status of this spec
might be measured.

Cheers,
Lucas

On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 6:37 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:

> Hello HTTP,
>
> This email starts a working group adoption call
> for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit (Retrofit Structured Fields
> for HTTP), which was discussed as potential new work at our interim meeting
> last week.
>
> You can find the draft here:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit-02.html
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit/
>
> This adoption call will last for two weeks. Please reply to this email by
> Monday, February 21, and indicate whether you think this document should be
> adopted by the WG.
>
> Best,
> Tommy
>