IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 13 February 2015 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9361A702B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:57:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X_lRc_DWP7_X for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65E7E1A701C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YMGhO-0007kr-1s for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:54:26 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:54:26 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YMGhO-0007kr-1s@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YMGhE-0007k6-Uv for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:54:16 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YMGhD-0006iy-IH for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:54:16 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.26] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCLx3-1YVNMB1809-0094eS; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:53:38 +0100
Message-ID: <54DE01DB.1060302@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:53:31 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <0E4872BF-EBCB-42C0-9BF9-8BC179C1BDDA@mnot.net> <54DAB257.5000203@treenet.co.nz> <54DB1630.3040306@gmx.de> <54DB2A89.2010001@treenet.co.nz> <54DB32BB.10609@gmx.de> <54DBC238.80404@treenet.co.nz>
In-Reply-To: <54DBC238.80404@treenet.co.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:OZHNSV1tdOY6jCJfCnEhGQOHLVVWoAxPSnpLxdFitQ5urjWHv/g K5I6Fif8SjfadBZ8qkJ3wJUMU/9q71Y8NR1Q8FvY3CzzNfA8lcm1fDzNOUqBr7LVrMGo0qC cp62NM+vRKaxxHEQoBxIjrPIbzXKNEG4rJ6qlIdtyZQrOKVpYfwcyF5FRyj9B4atHMDoQkc m9xNFTsiIv1+hhZh174MA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.15; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.356, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YMGhD-0006iy-IH 624ccc93e67e97433e0bc5267f8a59ff
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/54DE01DB.1060302@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28831
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2015-02-11 21:57, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> ...
> If the auth is out-of-band. In the web form payload for example, or TLS
> based certificate authentication. This header would make a good binding
> between them and HTTP.
> ...

AFAIU, for TLS cert based auth, this is a problem in HTTP/2 anyway (due 
to renegotiation); see 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-httpbis-cant-01>.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email