Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Wed, 02 December 2020 03:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F333A0FCD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:55:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.772
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.772 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jEdpD72pXJ3Q for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D0E83A0FCE for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1kkJC7-0006QR-Ii for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 03:52:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 03:52:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1kkJC7-0006QR-Ii@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <tpauly@apple.com>) id 1kkJC6-0006Pb-Ai for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 03:52:42 +0000
Received: from ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com ([17.171.2.68]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <tpauly@apple.com>) id 1kkJC4-000739-2A for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 03:52:42 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B23mKAU007475; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:52:27 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=content-type : mime-version : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc : content-transfer-encoding : message-id : references : to; s=20180706; bh=ALBifg9I8ZyiTfz7Ie4DCAuz8KI8gqjx7FuTq3hZkXk=; b=BgRwe+NEpm5LSj8YQDwmWob/7ya8a0z6RJI6P5Yh2f063jDUNqgj2a9+3ptZ/zuYWW2S wZxESzkgPivpeQNjhQNrpYwntJhYblXsfklHhx5HmWGELnMhJ7pUC9nA//yU+/2On5ZV Q6zDYVt1uwe97xxCF27jov5qavf9a6N+EvmpHNBnYVJCG90iiJzQPojgpusMWbLWtQoK MXlKQlX4/ownBXo1laFXzDZpC0qQ4ac03icLBbaOBunPTwxCWwjr51iSlfQaqXCehxHB fZWqdrItZCckbPwPt0qFGyDoObA0589WdJNK6JS0So9nU+IrhQ1BUkKLbn02+k3i5l6K Jw==
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp01.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp01.rno.apple.com [10.225.203.149]) by ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com with ESMTP id 353m3x78k8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 19:52:27 -0800
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.14]) by rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.6.20200729 64bit (built Jul 29 2020)) with ESMTPS id <0QKP00QLX1FFCR40@rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp01.rno.apple.com>; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 19:52:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.6.20200729 64bit (built Jul 29 2020)) id <0QKP009001F7C000@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com>; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 19:52:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: aeebd4fdd5963ddcce0b17227227efb6
X-Va-E-CD: 20fd7cacefd37a2bcb2becc43f5e91e9
X-Va-R-CD: 07c9963dc49f1b683eb181808d78d1d1
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: 2d366c99-8eb9-4352-9bd8-7a196b726073
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: aeebd4fdd5963ddcce0b17227227efb6
X-V-E-CD: 20fd7cacefd37a2bcb2becc43f5e91e9
X-V-R-CD: 07c9963dc49f1b683eb181808d78d1d1
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: 2ae9955e-0da5-4a4d-8b5e-116d3e7505d1
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312,18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-01_12:2020-11-30,2020-12-01 signatures=0
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [17.232.160.186]) by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.6.20200729 64bit (built Jul 29 2020)) with ESMTPSA id <0QKP0012K1DYK900@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com>; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 19:52:26 -0800 (PST)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.26\))
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <BE51D899-1C82-4E3A-A035-FD079CCBE333@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 19:52:26 -0800
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <5ADA2DB3-C522-4F04-A508-36C1DBBABFAB@apple.com>
References: <BE51D899-1C82-4E3A-A035-FD079CCBE333@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.26)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312,18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-01_12:2020-11-30,2020-12-01 signatures=0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=17.171.2.68; envelope-from=tpauly@apple.com; helo=ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.497, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1kkJC4-000739-2A 3149ddba1d70fb837a65b4a76d91f153
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/5ADA2DB3-C522-4F04-A508-36C1DBBABFAB@apple.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38262
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Thanks to everyone who provided feedback on adopting the Cookie Incrementalism work!

Based on this input, it looks like we have strong support in the working group to bring this content into RFC6265bis.

Mike and John, as editors of RFC6265bis, please work on merging in the appropriate content from draft-west-cookie-incrementalism.

Best,
Tommy & Mark

> On Nov 12, 2020, at 3:45 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> Those with good memories will recall that when we started RFC6265bis, we required significant changes to the specification to be backed by a separate I-D, so that we could judge consensus and implementation support for it separately. See:
>  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015OctDec/0165.html
> 
> In the spirit of that, we have one more proposal for consideration:
>  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-cookie-incrementalism-01
> 
> Parts of this were discussed at the recent interim:
>  https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/interim-20-10/rfc6265bis.pdf#page=3
> 
> Other parts (e.g., s 3.4-3.6) may need more discussion; if we adopt the draft, we may decide that they aren't worth pursuing, but by default we'd spend some time discussing them.
> 
> Please comment on whether you support adoption of this document into RFC6265bis. In particular, we're looking for implementer feedback because -- as before -- our goal for this effort is to be closely aligned with implementation behaviour. 
> 
> The Call for Adoption will run until 27 November.
> 
> - Mark and Tommy