Re: p6 -14 version and ticket #274

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 28 April 2011 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B63E0715 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.302, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IWNPg80V3QMK for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27040E06F5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1QFSa9-0006EI-W2 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:52:42 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1QFSWZ-0004og-Ql for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:48:59 +0000
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by lisa.w3.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1QFSWU-0001LZ-AG for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:48:59 +0000
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2011 14:48:27 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.148]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp054) with SMTP; 28 Apr 2011 16:48:27 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+s2igRlrus9gdOe/Xm9yt034Kr1T7VprZsj4WnMi 62/pGIjCtWn6/n
Message-ID: <4DB97E36.9000105@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:48:22 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
CC: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <4DB9789F.2010305@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DB9789F.2010305@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=213.165.64.22; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mailout-de.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1QFSWU-0001LZ-AG cf1e01eab28c6f92f4b6d75b74e9ff73
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: p6 -14 version and ticket #274
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/4DB97E36.9000105@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/10436
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1QFSa9-0006EI-W2@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:52:41 +0000

On 28.04.2011 16:24, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> Hello httpbis WG members,
>
> According to TracTickets, ticket #274 on IANA registry for warn-codes
> (used in "Warning" header field, see
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-14#section-3.6)
> was opened 2 month ago.  During this time there were 2 version of p6
> posted, as I remember, none of which dealt with this issue.
>
> I've recently asked Mark Nottingham, WG chair, regarding the process of
> this issue. He pointed me to
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/274.  I haven't
> tracked this page, but I see it doesn't represent any progress on this
> issue.  I haven't also tracked discussions on this list, so I'm
> currently not aware of any discussions occurred on this issue.
>
> So my question is: Whether WG is going to include my proposal in your p6
> in its new version?  Or there is an another agreement?
> ...

"The WG" are the people around here on this mailing list.

So far I haven't seen a lot of enthusiasm for the proposal. As one of 
the editors, I prefer to avoid adding stuff that nobody needs.

More discussion of course is welcome, that's why we're tracking it.

Best regards, Julian