Re: URI equivalence and query parameter sequence
Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Mon, 11 July 2011 21:29 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B9221F8F69 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nF-vzLPzCcj6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E14511E82B8 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1QgO1k-0002XE-Ho for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:28:28 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <derhoermi@gmx.net>) id 1QgO1d-0002WO-B5 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:28:21 +0000
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by lisa.w3.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <derhoermi@gmx.net>) id 1QgO1b-00019b-In for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:28:21 +0000
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2011 21:27:52 -0000
Received: from dslb-094-223-185-199.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO HIVE) [94.223.185.199] by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 11 Jul 2011 23:27:52 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19VQqB0l1JVLiMQ74i/i8NIXPTJ+5Vhi1RRqzEHme iHJlt4VDGI2++S
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Darrel Miller <darrel@tavis.ca>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:28:08 +0200
Message-ID: <5aqm17dn7jeq5rme9scofcl18k9cncubbr@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <076601cc3fee$6166b8b0$24342a10$@tavis.ca>
In-Reply-To: <076601cc3fee$6166b8b0$24342a10$@tavis.ca>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=213.165.64.22; envelope-from=derhoermi@gmx.net; helo=mailout-de.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1QgO1b-00019b-In 887f7ad5f4a38461a8cde4a1d4769a87
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: URI equivalence and query parameter sequence
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5aqm17dn7jeq5rme9scofcl18k9cncubbr@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/10935
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1QgO1k-0002XE-Ho@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:28:28 +0000
* Darrel Miller wrote: >To get to the point, I would like to know if the following two URIs can be >considered equivalent. > > http://example.org/location?x=34&y=67 > > http://example.org/location?y=67&x=34 They can be considered equivalent and they can be considered different. If you make a crawler and find you have to aggressively weed out dupli- cates, you might find it best to consider them equivalent. In other cases you might find it best to consider them different. You may also have specific knowledge about `example.org` that provides an answer. Unlike for, say, the difference between "http:" and "HTTP:" there is no generic specification that answers your question. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
- URI equivalence and query parameter sequence Darrel Miller
- Re: URI equivalence and query parameter sequence Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: URI equivalence and query parameter sequence Dale Anderson