IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-06

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 19 September 2018 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C220013107D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mLpvGRS_811J for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D689C131089 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1g2f9S-0008St-T0 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:16:30 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:16:30 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1g2f9S-0008St-T0@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1g2f9N-0008SG-Gi for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:16:25 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1g2f9M-0007zf-3Y for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:16:25 +0000
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([217.251.143.189]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOwY7-1g7rfY3a6h-006M7U; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:15:55 +0200
To: Ilya Grigorik <ilya@igvita.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
References: <20180722160302.504054F0A1@welho-filter4.welho.com> <CAKRe7JE3KmT=of0UG9TYajjnLC2Hu2-s=yW0MWSACoqjOsiYtw@mail.gmail.com> <d429106f-0cff-ecc0-ee33-61f079b22531@gmx.de> <CAKRe7JHTZTHs0X-FGieZH7pXfodzzThXeF7SfD4Zmzd61f4AJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <a0d9a665-c74a-ceb4-406b-5635b2d58dcc@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:15:53 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKRe7JHTZTHs0X-FGieZH7pXfodzzThXeF7SfD4Zmzd61f4AJw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:DyfI7b881WUOIh9klKTYmpFb9+RcgEKyWbST8FO4wwkP4LOV4OZ FxqHmj4bt0HszepmWKOA2csbQzhGDnG59hl5jj2O5J3SWUT/SGlwg6xwotJ73X8Ul/lsvI1 S+VDpm+ok4FRzofF4dqxhciXZr9keAXKvMGFFHbbxCw5FCpdznh6C12mTpQFC1fRG8gG4IN 8I7b07a8u/xtwbLrrd1dA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:msFTik32zRk=:3JIINe3TmoHf5G15tYIu2h Ix2jaNfwtHC8IgyJ+i0dUPaIj7qjG8qwAyyyRD0/DnnNEGJVYYCTv+Wu8SU+uN3GF3UxbCd+a kycK6cRqHtErrI4B3sG+vwwCvmH7F80GmcQBeYuP8BqGmFiiQGJKNB2TqHqNpgucWhqR5yzzg ePlf+vudp+FNax9kDVLH+gkwSkYtb5eVBYg0M3gAQLUMn7VMp2tHQ1I2XC5PZ0tnOXxHZfK7Q T5fVlr4rWeb8274jkjXnqMIPg8h9co+wpSZdBAmU4gg9phuwO971Okp4lTQeTTZlGL92W9qlX o70vgvB0HiVVqyq1PdODuKKRKKnkRYvP6g6WEyy0zcKg9EhTrw52bPp4h4OMN7MpEdcOz4YIy 0TRfWQjQySlVjMzst886puyAk+VP+pfphCZ8oaMWU8EbNTED12l8gSSeJiNdfLS4BsMthZCnX aWVdG7rqpNOKlQx+25WtHDxIH/Mue4eSTkiIMuNdRyMAVuwgjG3Chom29hE9bxx9FXYqBSyPm kKDRhchYJ7eIjat6GLIVFxoka89+CTgyKOM33lMn4mZo4IK335FOwb9H6DA2XN+5WpOjvTsOh eYsuyuq7xg6Kuq4QLv7t12TSea+Cwe2PNCJmEsUXZoTJ0V0+0qbF+hJrAvnp/xlBGYd9oKihf NktQiD0yFopmtP9wDA2NgBJrZNDwwSZcnh9Ui3nYVlLa/3tlpvrY1JPNbnauelbmInSk0c/3M MJbNut4wTmzn5vRCCjnaxT0wuepzaCQ3FA/+fa+nL5uWjBX1X70hku6rf1pvI5gM/ar8/sl1f X9JfDTJVKLpuv/kFlJ1F9hnm4LwuqiCDq/Pvy1QqFjg0xpvlQk=
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1g2f9M-0007zf-3Y 1911096191e42c52ce3dc225d0f72f87
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-06
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/a0d9a665-c74a-ceb4-406b-5635b2d58dcc@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35921
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 8/8/2018 6:52 AM, Ilya Grigorik wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 12:46 AM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de 
> <mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de>> wrote:
> 
>      >
>      > Mark, Julian: any guidance on this one?
>      >
>      >     |   If <X> occurs in a message more than once, the last value
>      >     |   overrides all previous occurrences.
>      >
>      >     So it should mention that on these header fields also last value
>      >     is used when values are ',' -separated.
>      >
>      >
>      > My understanding is that this is implicit, but if that's not the
>     case,
>      > happy to rework the wording.
>      > ...
> 
>     No, it's not implicit, so yes, a clarification would be good.
> 
>     FWIW, related issue in http-core:
>     <https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/111>
> 
> 
> Ah, interesting. Thanks for the pointer!
> 
> Obvious followup question: do we have any existing, vetted text in other 
> specs that I should be looking at? I can't imagine this is the first 
> instance of this particular problem.

I don't think we have good text yet.

We should discuss over here or in the github issue, and once we have a 
stable proposal, you could steal text from that.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email