Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-17.txt> (Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) to Informational RFC

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 29 November 2016 00:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997FE12A1C9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:34:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.397
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32XTfnuT_zlx for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:34:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01EA412A197 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:34:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cBWJt-0002lF-05 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:30:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:30:48 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cBWJt-0002lF-05@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cBWJg-0001d3-3T for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:30:36 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cBWJY-0000Ch-IE for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:30:30 +0000
Received: from [] (unknown []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E2F722E262 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:30:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_15406225-DAF4-416A-BD46-D2D408011F5E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Message-Id: <D2C4C74D-2DA4-41EE-A07C-14938342AF79@mnot.net>
References: <148036011985.5514.3457646909214230918.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:30:01 +1100
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.745, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cBWJY-0000Ch-IE 96f87057ac8e41f75881cc6dc232c696
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-17.txt> (Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) to Informational RFC
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/D2C4C74D-2DA4-41EE-A07C-14938342AF79@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33030
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

FYI. Has anyone here reviewed yet?


> Begin forwarded message:
> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-17.txt> (Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations) to Informational RFC
> Date: 29 November 2016 at 6:08:39 am AEDT
> To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: alexey.melnikov@isode.com, core-chairs@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-http-mapping@ietf.org
> Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
> Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/Nr9Ds78Buln0dM70oVFz9rCbTGw>
> The IESG has received a request from the Constrained RESTful Environments
> WG (core) to consider the following document:
> - 'Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations'
>  <draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-17.txt> as Informational RFC
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-12-12. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> This is a Second IETF LC for the document. The document was initially
> targeted at Informational, but is now targeting to become Proposed Standard.
> Abstract
>   This document provides reference information for implementing a
>   cross-protocol network proxy that performs translation from the HTTP
>   protocol to CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol).  This will
>   enable an HTTP client to access resources on a CoAP server through
>   the proxy.  This document describes how an HTTP request is mapped to
>   a CoAP request, and then how a CoAP response is mapped back to an
>   HTTP response.  This includes guidelines for status code, URI, and
>   media type mappings, as well as additional interworking advice.
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-http-mapping/
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-http-mapping/ballot/
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.

Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/