Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925)
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 07 February 2017 04:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924A512996F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:13:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O0w7yP5no_zT for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:13:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C52812996D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:13:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cax7w-0000rw-Q7 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 04:11:36 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 04:11:36 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cax7w-0000rw-Q7@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1cax7s-0000p9-V1 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 04:11:32 +0000
Received: from mail-qk0-f196.google.com ([209.85.220.196]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1cax7l-0004Kd-Vb for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 04:11:27 +0000
Received: by mail-qk0-f196.google.com with SMTP id u25so11514903qki.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 20:11:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JAfe7jtPhDQ/RnZbQ6wQevaliTAj01f4ZhmL6ZqcHm0=; b=FG7Rlo3BktN4BZsqfhLFlE7cUdQhiy1nMlFPynWwcGWM5gOWpl/RyXJIblc86ZkkgT TwUujx0xcx8fGTi4zmSwttw6mQMLofzshwg03cpONSUgLFYZCQNkQKP5hQfpAU2dctaJ 25jfmNOqUlzBUvMp7AuCrGvBMf/YcjS6MOuAsmgT0vElvmCKKBASFkKq045cl1On8T47 AZ/ETtxxmKVAMASBXw6WYT8WYjFBFqJEN6AfjSuxtiX/3nQKAp/jpqVoaOHB10gSd7f9 8S06Vyob2fRvjMCmIdwAmYlOsqAoejtQqvssAtRoq6goZ7tg9USUAbFhgwM2mDZac1c8 kS/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JAfe7jtPhDQ/RnZbQ6wQevaliTAj01f4ZhmL6ZqcHm0=; b=Q/oCSOewqoF8zhwLSi08mhe1F5SDU1VbZn29itVN5TsOCOOkvCXEqcLxa4KpZJ234c +a5CFQohkxWkkgo9wQ2NT27u9GQ5FVzCLmoM/8G3WgzaTbOLj/DaUbi0gM7QitlO9vQA Cj2F6GLUeQ6NSbhj8X3heMZrRvMWF5ihMZuAzbWFSlWqT9eKQ38GPbWIOqJ0yU6KsGaM Asd/3LobZtJixn5sDSe8gl8ShY68wv5YEWLNPP8nwNHkLHcmcXAPMLX2PYI2djNqlc+d 5a/XUWRDgM8MRoOcZADyNv3VY5k7zkSrB0m0AWvD19Xdq7LRCq38zz7k4CYfJ4uUlbIv YYFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nvd7vwJpiS8HAX0yZP5aI7ftpJ0rhC0R8C0YyVgZH7LhwZKjm9ciRvfmTul6lHQkVzCUBwqiSgkWSx6A==
X-Received: by 10.55.99.80 with SMTP id x77mr11940206qkb.147.1486440660203; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 20:11:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.19.112 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:10:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6BBC3056-487E-47D4-9FCE-739E6BB65FF4@mnot.net>
References: <20170207034920.A495EB81178@rfc-editor.org> <6BBC3056-487E-47D4-9FCE-739E6BB65FF4@mnot.net>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:10:59 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVNy-jBs0Na_OYjX8yLvBikQeJ9E5nxsoigHGcRD_6Y6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.196; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f196.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.566, BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cax7l-0004Kd-Vb 48c509ca9e43b2b1ca6b0a38f65a5fff
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnVNy-jBs0Na_OYjX8yLvBikQeJ9E5nxsoigHGcRD_6Y6g@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33458
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 7 February 2017 at 15:07, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Folks, please have a look at this and confirm that this is the intent. Note that after reading Scott's last email, I've made a small tweak to what I proposed originally (that is, the priority of many streams can be affected). > Martin, I'm assuming the status we want is HOLD FOR DOCUMENT UPDATE? Yup. p.s., I think that it's awesome that these emails go to mailto:text/plain@rfc-editor.org and mailto:charset=UTF-8@rfc-editor.org
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925) Martin Thomson