Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2 feedback

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Wed, 31 July 2013 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA4E21F9EA1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uP04R-TKebcK for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2277C11E8182 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V4Xgi-0007Je-Do for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:47:40 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:47:40 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V4Xgi-0007Je-Do@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1V4XgW-0007Iv-Ni for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:47:28 +0000
Received: from ip-58-28-153-233.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([58.28.153.233] helo=treenet.co.nz) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1V4XgV-0000nq-Fn for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:47:28 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.218] (ip202-27-218-168.satlan.co.nz [202.27.218.168]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67053E6FB8 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:47:01 +1200 (NZST)
Message-ID: <51F92362.6020900@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 02:46:58 +1200
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <51F8DA31.20903@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <51F8DA31.20903@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=58.28.153.233; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.449, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1V4XgV-0000nq-Fn 48b08648ea57f20b13f80ca00ae413fd
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2 feedback
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51F92362.6020900@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/19013
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 31/07/2013 9:34 p.m., Julian Reschke wrote:
> Questions:
>
<snip>
>
> 5.2.2
>
> "Deployments with constrained resources (for example, memory) MAY 
> employ flow control to limit the amount of memory a peer can consume. 
> Note, however, that this can lead to suboptimal use of available 
> network resources if flow control is enabled without knowledge of the 
> bandwidth-delay product (see [RFC1323])."
>
> s/MAY/can/
>

I took this as being intentionally normative language. One participant 
MAY use the feature therefore all participante MUST implement support 
just in case it happens. With "can" there is no normative requirement on 
the other participants to implement anything regarding flow control, 
which would lead to harm for the participant needing it.


Amos