IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-02

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 20 January 2022 09:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E478C3A1EEC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 01:54:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.362
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.362 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H1E8scNRaGYC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 01:54:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A37703A1EEB for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 01:54:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1nAU9L-000325-Gp for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:54:35 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:54:35 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1nAU9L-000325-Gp@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1nAU9J-00030j-6l for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:54:33 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1nAU9H-0004pA-7s for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:54:33 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1642672454; bh=Sqa84yU5U+i+frrlNkNvmlXGMsXa9elu3qnPKjR1TaM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=aHNdWn3Er3bBGiIXrTWfeXHVy9mD8yB33kkKM5+SornXiXEMDTaZo3DFVoPqglgSP wfP2pXYeQRKV5AWA/VDhXhtehzpLGmcNnt15xTL63yzKbXrXuDSNGAeyeJtTEXc+E/ oxtRWTXIDpt2+WMbQ3pEOYhcWTAEaklYn3nwMcaM=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.62] ([84.171.155.205]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M72sJ-1nE3aL018h-008YIF; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:54:14 +0100
Message-ID: <90ad938f-139a-99d7-2573-941b8ae84542@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:54:11 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0
To: "Slik, David" <David.Slik@netapp.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <CO6PR06MB7556DEBED9156324B1BC8360E6509@CO6PR06MB7556.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <CO6PR06MB75567B02A53DEDDDCFE831BCE65A9@CO6PR06MB7556.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <1595be96-bcf5-8443-0b74-0b1d319399a2@gmx.de> <CO6PR06MB755611A9D419FEAC4E36C70BE65A9@CO6PR06MB7556.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR06MB755611A9D419FEAC4E36C70BE65A9@CO6PR06MB7556.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:J/LLUGbv4iskIi+bqExHnXpnWYTbgbww/jobyQb/8YLU+3ntxcz xAchD7MnfyxPeAVEb1xKBVKVFXqZsslHZmdAnptMl7DhrNTsRN2ni6m9M9lSFcAcRVwxNuT uNnsQ4UZBcAPmtajABdWT6t1EhDmslpInDecBcYHi+Df9DfwOTO+1u5JXCRDmsQqRSDIrVY A/Z7eWGxqk7pVyUGhNCwA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:PcJF7vlcALw=:zeIhbIwZAVKUxrd941s57z wY1+xGgN6knFZfHdiSHzhU7JufyWiEnKsLS0xshZOflr4aQTT+HVzVz+H/XljMLSr0etbAh0I 79IbVpx1Cf3SmU6aQ3ROUptIZTA/SFlsKvimqlNFDOckvrBe+m6xe+++eB07s14WQCmVFTKpA QNJW7ApGcbXrgcYydBGaQVvCYaMlEv7Weboi/bobiD0oUC1H0zWvKSQYo58wN4ZUzlbo7mHJK PlyeMrvOm44TwIxf2yCaGiGlWeV3Kgj0MtpV8ldLXzUT78cpxMHOeH/0xp+D2bBLnO13n/VQH ncDUn4tuM0PAxzHHEmiacrIOD9Y3J1Y8RQb8Iyixxu72eMcA7y9WuxJMweA/9Xbo3zAWn3+u0 KKPV6MWc3So7hQks2sb6scZDSGjiDW3QeXiASEUx1JobvyCjEsfqeXeo4YOZqeJ+Kn1gfpL/I 2Rl+WinQteglM8dLv8ElSNRPWN9IYO8iySQFNLd4T2Fhi+G+2UvvWAoCs74TCr+/Tat/8F1uD 5GlvnDECetKcRPm2ghI+TMWTCVk1J2bRaiBg/gXh4s1R2JXCmnFqPGTsFSXFRDFCZ480ANssb DKcvZUVZ1pf6eezvwy2mBATgeYRtYXS3BtHDo/kjXTLHU/7BXemcZaJWCC9Gzac+d/GJbFRNb yUqe7Gula6rwI9WS0e52Pz32BIDWZ9A0yuzlrL1VLbVGp2mAfpj60cKzRkcH5qphVzx5lcHZo N99fyxAIat8ueP8fdZBsRQrdTwtNKUEg3QAFzzkD9rmnNyMTnM9RmJR8/xqX+FhrMjnyaKaE6 Lw4bSFncqDBLQ8Bd3AQOdfi3PGMpEJkFf5G9++5yxy0U3zm3msuXkrB8B5Qf07UrIAuDYZ4mP 2FkXvHUsLXnhHqr1znAI6Ypo/BmQQEcdgtyliSZSq3QZDUEvDNaHwzwfrV2e9Elglo24tLlTP rki0cGueW95vU30CrDI2U+md1yTCUfTAJ7jzDSblumLSN6jHjsFXiDJ8vuoWG8IU5VsGSK/km lEX+pT3FL0Am/7t1c4rWQNnv8tgUA73tLQlHzMPtHPGjG8Mm3+DbuESSbV4jwNE9g+8jFxMgI WA1lsvLygCKJoQ=
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=julian.reschke@gmx.de domain=gmx.net), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1nAU9H-0004pA-7s 4fd4c44bdaa76f38b18b90e84ba39c43
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Feedback on draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-02
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/90ad938f-139a-99d7-2573-941b8ae84542@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/39768
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Am 20.01.2022 um 10:42 schrieb Slik, David:
> ...
>> "content" is the correct term as per
>> <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19.html#content
> <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19.html#content>>.
>> (But we could hyperlink that).
>
> Guess I'm showing my 2616 age. :)
>
> Thanks for the pointer to that draft. Nice to see all of the 723x RFCs,
> etc, being consolidated together.
> ...

Most :-). "HTTP/1.1" (the message format) is separate, so is Caching.

>> I agree that more examples would be good. However, this would introduce
>> a dependency on a draft that is likely to be finished farer in the
>> future. Maybe there's a simpler-but-standardized JSON query language
>> that we can use (optimally with a defined media type...).
>
> Ah, I did not know that the timeline for draft-ietf-jsonpath-base was
> further out.

It's just an assumption.

> I will take an action item to draft another example based on something
> similar that is already approved.
>
> Would you like me to open it as an issue in github, or send it to the
> mailing list for discussion first?
> ..

Both works for us. If we expect a change (like adding an example),
directly starting with a Github issue makes sense.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email