IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WebSocket over HTTP/2.0

Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com> Mon, 24 March 2014 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2ED31A0164 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 01:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5w_eupTw4Inu for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 01:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C951A015B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 01:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1WS0XJ-0000Me-Qx for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:47:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:47:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1WS0XJ-0000Me-Qx@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <yhirano@google.com>) id 1WS0X6-0000IL-KR for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:47:00 +0000
Received: from mail-yk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.160.170]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <yhirano@google.com>) id 1WS0X5-0008Am-PM for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:47:00 +0000
Received: by mail-yk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 9so13854131ykp.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 01:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=z+P6bzAJnJq7+UeQ+hNEr3zO/SlbHoxUqlAKI76y1TU=; b=VE8OynaAvT6xqeTIM3UihzzwdyKdj/XCQLLW/S3E9uSjg+u2NM4id1bOXMGWTDOvL0 vU2Nw95PRR5sdEmn2Qf4Omfc6ZaCVQkPLwQGTsURzvIViloselVw5SZsUFl85IIBSnxm K4synG6oO2CfN60PmTx1LzSwsuykQgY/dDcjaHroiyLB0rcWstRhG0ylzp9RPR3XX8lp wIJ/4DZQnpKN6ayn64xe9DOLJNi/Pf7pXG4A/a0r0dukDT/TCzbY+JnGqEr7/hXvTDWw 6Pcp2gC3SDEBU6IrmO80ZAju/fUy32WUXLrqxgjYc/P7wk7RusbcHFLDwt5v/Dqscr35 hmBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=z+P6bzAJnJq7+UeQ+hNEr3zO/SlbHoxUqlAKI76y1TU=; b=ZWuofUdWNXVYWaQUa0Lii0PssipynI6qUrgnXmQOebgpB85y8pXQ/3iYqKV0Hfmj2p MR9tDvn1JbKiY/OHBXXhhtqPUT32UkVMwLiaLcPKixsgpz90KdM6DqM20KoG5odHWVaj NtMGNH8iBQmQfVefb3n+DUfSDu6lY5NiOESRpc3Kst32WOkR9paXpg0aVkAjEjHYT+Jp DQ2VoTGTOMFHsWsZStjD+51FfqIKRZi32kYbnEkjiFRZIIB/JBkOv9JThnfxXpK+iT3u 308gFkMMWW/nntbr4F5dyShUiak2qdr5mLYeJHEFGgGC+TpljR4D87F79U6ZmXhe6AWN Hkmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnlGQIbFAV+ZHCK/nLSdZ+kyBUXvTsdRq/wqVsnEJRJJeKMzhfd64CyhvdRIU7BFFPHvOgHP5W1Hxbjl8PZKEt2WImrZDulqoHqXXahKeeV9OK1EOKmgqyAZULOMP0uzML41GTnIT2I7tXtCkyxsW1Zrjrd+k0WQvhFH+AuMMUzRSXbgubJWb1DeXFMlucmaqJitqVb
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.85.134 with SMTP id u6mr89263771yhe.8.1395650793561; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 01:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.164.87 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 01:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH9hSJaXU+EgJxvDzhQr-5MQ_Em-_v1dJHjKZ+AaLixBR1CCBg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABihn6GO7wmYNhyx58Jt43vv0QXzn2=QDqny14byA7DbKfbEcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNeRCatTXan6j97JQWBrmhjqB5W7msNfoK7rGsFTKnUkZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW9jYcONs4gtUwFkq8Q8rMSH-d0ihHDszC68oQW+SPWCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABihn6GDRrQC6vnrZJXyFqeUsnZ0DB_4pqxgxXRU=952K6YPgA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnX3U=G6POLw2bRC_TaCBy66vdJYsqwa+dV2SqEFo+A=1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJaXU+EgJxvDzhQr-5MQ_Em-_v1dJHjKZ+AaLixBR1CCBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:46:33 +0900
Message-ID: <CABihn6Hfut_FJmbd0kBmZTE3BO35corS4bk_6Siu-PnDQ9J7Kw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com>
To: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3010e29bc7fb7d04f5564541"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.160.170; envelope-from=yhirano@google.com; helo=mail-yk0-f170.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.344, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1WS0X5-0008Am-PM da7361876ab216eb17752e173a1e9d1b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: WebSocket over HTTP/2.0
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABihn6Hfut_FJmbd0kBmZTE3BO35corS4bk_6Siu-PnDQ9J7Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/22871
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I've rewritten the Protocol Negotiation part (Section 3 and Section 4.2.1).
It now uses Alt-Svc instead of SETTINGS_SUPPORTED_SCHEMES.

https://github.com/yutakahirano/ws-over-http2/blob/master/draft-hirano-websocket-over-http2.txt

Comments will be appreciated.

Thanks,



On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> wrote:

> BTW, introduction of the SETTINGS_SUPPORTED_SCHEMES parameter for the
> SETTINGS frame in the proposal could be discussed separately from the
> framing discussion. It seems Mark's Alt-Svc I-D also has similar proposal
> called SETTINGS_UNIVERSAL_SCHEMES [1] though in a different context.
>
> [1]
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-03#section-3.4
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email