Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-03: (with COMMENT)
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 09 October 2018 06:27 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED1313118E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 23:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SLJhUapLEjAE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 23:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8CFA131011 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 23:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1g9lRm-0003sx-10 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 06:24:46 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 06:24:46 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1g9lRm-0003sx-10@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <adam@nostrum.com>) id 1g9lRl-0003sK-04 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 06:24:45 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([2001:1900:3001:11::2c]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <adam@nostrum.com>) id 1g9lRg-0002Yh-Uu for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 06:24:44 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF2B131011; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 23:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live@ietf.org, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, mcmanus@ducksong.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.86.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Message-ID: <153906625970.5712.18395809749679041131.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 23:24:19 -0700
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1g9lRg-0002Yh-Uu 8cc5ebd9cd75cf18081e78664382bf1e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-03: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/153906625970.5712.18395809749679041131.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35950
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-03: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to everyone who worked on this document. I have two rather small comments. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am quite uncomfortable with the nebulous definition of the term "Very Large Value" in this document. Given that "Very Large Values" are intended to serve as a negotiation mechanism, I would strongly suggest that a more formal definition of that term be added to this document (e.g., a client should send "a value of at least 2^^39 or twice the value of the end of the randomly accessible byte range, whichever is larger") --------------------------------------------------------------------------- §1.1: > The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", > "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this > document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. This document does not use these words in capitalized form. Especially in light of RFC 8174, this is likely to cause confusion. If the intention is to assign RFC 2119 definitions to the non-uppercased "must", "should", and "may" usage in this document, please capitalize those terms and update the boilerplate to that in RFC 8174. Otherwise, please remove this section.