Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4674)
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 26 April 2016 02:03 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B5E12B074 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hAXBmi2olaQr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7364312D0C3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ausGz-00059W-9x for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:58:45 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:58:45 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ausGz-00059W-9x@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1ausGt-00058g-IL for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:58:39 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1ausGq-000097-Tw for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:58:38 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [120.149.194.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B74222E1FA; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:58:07 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160421130409.9024F18046E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:58:04 +1000
Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, vfaronov@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <68A160B6-5DE8-45D3-A7E3-C96D9679D751@mnot.net>
References: <20160421130409.9024F18046E@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.358, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1ausGq-000097-Tw 96ed100e823d836f6d13cb7a5688c2bc
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4674)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/68A160B6-5DE8-45D3-A7E3-C96D9679D751@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31546
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Accept - I think that's correct. Cheers, > On 21 Apr 2016, at 11:04 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7234, > "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7234&eid=4674 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Vasiliy Faronov <vfaronov@gmail.com> > > Section: 5.4 > > Original Text > ------------- > When sending a no-cache request, a client ought to include both the > pragma and cache-control directives, unless Cache-Control: no-cache > is purposefully omitted to target other Cache-Control response > directives at HTTP/1.1 caches. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > When sending a no-cache request, a client ought to include both the > pragma and cache-control directives, unless Cache-Control: no-cache > is purposefully omitted to target other Cache-Control request > directives at HTTP/1.1 caches. > > Notes > ----- > "other Cache-Control response directives" was probably intended to be "other Cache-Control request directives," because a request cannot have response directives. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7234 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-26) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching > Publication Date : June 2014 > Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP > Area : Applications > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4674) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4674) Mark Nottingham
- [Errata Verified] RFC7234 (4674) RFC Errata System