IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-cice-02: (with DISCUSS)

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 07 September 2015 01:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3CD1A1BF8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 18:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oyvPPy2ji3gc for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 18:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71C911A86E2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 18:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZYlA3-0005GK-Rf for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 01:23:55 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 01:23:55 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZYlA3-0005GK-Rf@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1ZYl9w-0005FZ-SZ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 01:23:48 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1ZYl9v-0008HA-4u for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 01:23:48 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29B3122E1F4; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 21:23:20 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <55EB2E29.6040705@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 11:23:17 +1000
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@pobox.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <79D9795A-2C0A-4F4E-8A12-E3E388AF7CA5@mnot.net>
References: <20150902153943.26198.21461.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9F69E58B-58CA-48BB-AFBE-01E50840512C@mnot.net> <55E79BD0.4030707@cs.tcd.ie> <55E80971.9070905@greenbytes.de> <55E8172B.4030203@cs.tcd.ie> <55E9B300.2070702@gmx.de> <55E9B8F3.7010705@cs.tcd.ie> <55EB2E29.6040705@gmx.de>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.366, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1ZYl9v-0008HA-4u 05fc9dba206af4c5a518cea7c8e3a4a2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-cice-02: (with DISCUSS)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/79D9795A-2C0A-4F4E-8A12-E3E388AF7CA5@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30181
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

LGTM.

> On 6 Sep 2015, at 4:02 am, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 2015-09-04 17:29, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Julian,
>> 
>> That change would be great thanks,
>> 
>> S.
>> ...
> 
> 
> Ok,
> 
> the proposed changes made based on the IESG feedback can be seen here: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-cice-latest-from-previous.diff.html> (individual commits: <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commits/master/draft-ietf-httpbis-cice.xml>).
> 
> Are people ok with these changes? Should I go ahead an submit a new draft?
> 
> Best regards, Julian

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email