Re: p1: Upgrade ordering (possible HTTP/2 impact)

Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> Wed, 08 May 2013 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10FA21F8E04 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 22:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eE9BMdZfzag3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 22:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C0221F8D92 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 22:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UZwxZ-0006f5-Fq for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 05:30:37 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 05:30:37 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UZwxZ-0006f5-Fq@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>) id 1UZwxM-0006dq-RX for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 05:30:24 +0000
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.48]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>) id 1UZwxK-0001JK-Tr for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 05:30:23 +0000
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f3a6d0000007a4-78-5189e2d87889
Received: from esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 78.B4.01956.8D2E9815; Wed, 8 May 2013 07:30:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Wed, 8 May 2013 07:30:00 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A382885 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:30:00 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603E654B3C for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:29:59 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from n94.nomadiclab.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204EE54A33 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:29:59 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <5189E2D7.3070602@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 08:29:59 +0300
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <B49447FF-CB94-43ED-9CA2-0698C64BB554@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <B49447FF-CB94-43ED-9CA2-0698C64BB554@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre6NR52BBs8v6VscbpnF5MDocXTe ftYAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujFPbH7IVdLFUXDtq0MC4gLmLkZNDQsBEomPTFRYIW0ziwr31 bF2MXBxCAqcYJRqW7WYESQgJrGeUeHHUEiJxlVHixuo3zBDOCUaJ0z/2skA4BxglXr0/CTaX V0Bb4lrfCbC5LAIqEi1rellBbDYBM4nnD7cA1XBwiAokS/zf4Q1RLihxcuYTsHIRAXGJrvs7 wDYLC1hLTP96hhXiCmuJQ1u2gNmcAjYSLxd2MYHYzAK2EhfmXGeBsOUltr+dA/WamsTVc5uY IXq1JHrPdjJNYBSZhWTdLCTts5C0L2BkXsXInpuYmZNebr6JERjIB7f8NtjBuOm+2CFGaQ4W JXHeZK7GQCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2M6RzyHIUru15uzjTaGcH+Qba1s3SD Uh2HQcHefzeyG16u4+jRzdvNbVfi+oNn52t+i9+Sl25ElJ7L4ig/d37GHQPTqw5RqcXOz7kU 7NlumC7ZXOkRG6lScuBctzPbJ93NE0tmslzOsqgremz9ONr124wD2mulLs9fdr3/i0HIvWuH JGPfXzirxFKckWioxVxUnAgA3azqnTICAAA=
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.180.251.48; envelope-from=salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com; helo=mailgw7.ericsson.se
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.967, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UZwxK-0001JK-Tr a2ea396b07b4be616cc1696de69e2ad9
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: p1: Upgrade ordering (possible HTTP/2 impact)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5189E2D7.3070602@ericsson.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17888
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 4/20/13 7:07 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> p1 section 6.7 defines the Upgrade header, but no where does it say anything about relative preference.
>
> Should we define (or at least allow) for the ordering to be semantically significant? It seems to me that if we end up using this, and there are a few different variants of HTTP/2 (e.g., "normal" vs "mobile"), it'd be nice to rely on ordering here.
Mark
do you foresee the possibility HTTP/2 will be (or behave) differently 
or  it is just an example?

/Sal