IETF Logo Mail Archive

(rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding

Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> Fri, 23 December 2016 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2231293EC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:01:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pzzoSVY5-5ON for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C54D12896F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cKKlC-0003KP-VJ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:59:27 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:59:26 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cKKlC-0003KP-VJ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi>) id 1cKKl5-0003JN-VU for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:59:20 +0000
Received: from smtpvgate.fmi.fi ([193.166.223.36]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi>) id 1cKKl4-0000Qz-MU for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:59:19 +0000
Received: from basaari.fmi.fi (basaari.fmi.fi [193.166.211.14]) (envelope-from hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi) by smtpVgate.fmi.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8/smtpgate-20161014/smtpVgate) with ESMTP id uBN7wo6k006004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 09:58:50 +0200
Received: from shell.siilo.fmi.fi by basaari.fmi.fi with ESMTP id uBN7wnBU008938 ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 09:58:49 +0200
Received: from shell.siilo.fmi.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by shell.siilo.fmi.fi with ESMTP id uBN7wneV003155 ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 09:58:49 +0200
Received: by shell.siilo.fmi.fi id uBN7wndh003154; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 09:58:49 +0200
Message-Id: <201612230758.uBN7wndh003154@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>
In-Reply-To: <201612230744.uBN7ir0E002689@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>
References: <CABkgnnWhc6ZdjgV5degiJuK-P6qSZk_uMjLm9zctyqdOSUaxPw@mail.gmail.com> <20161222060124.733EB1A95C@welho-filter4.welho.com> <CABkgnnVmHMPgBG6=GbN7iPWJQNJ46Nn6Cp39uZRB9zABSmS-2g@mail.gmail.com> <201612230744.uBN7ir0E002689@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 09:58:49 +0200
Sender: hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi
From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
CC: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version ME+ 2.5 PLalpha44]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Filter: smtpVgate.fmi.fi: 3 received headers rewritten with id 20161223/16097/01
X-Filter: smtpVgate.fmi.fi: ID 16098/01, 1 parts scanned for known viruses
X-Filter: basaari.fmi.fi: ID 359388/01, 1 parts scanned for known viruses
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtpVgate.fmi.fi [193.166.223.36]); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 09:58:50 +0200 (EET)
Received-SPF: none client-ip=193.166.223.36; envelope-from=hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi; helo=smtpVgate.fmi.fi
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.514, BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cKKl4-0000Qz-MU e0ca86476fbd5c9710d28c135e4d2b99
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/201612230758.uBN7wndh003154@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33231
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>: (Fri Dec 23 09:44:53 2016)
> You mean that on
> 
>    "The client has requested the well-known URI from the origin over an authenticated 
>     connection and a 200 (OK) response was provided, and"
> 
> authenticated connection is authenticated alternative.

Hmm. I need rephrase.  Sorry for duplicate mail.

Question is that well-known URI need to requested from all putative
alternatives or not?. Yes, you can not request that from clear text 
connection now.

But need you request it from new alternative service when you
are requsted from previous alaternative service?

In other words is there requirement that given alternative service
is tested ?

/ Kari Hurtta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email