getting the HTTP/1.1 specs published
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 02 February 2014 17:12 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34F81A00EA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 09:12:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ufLd4roy-yBi for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 09:12:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6289D1A00E3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 09:12:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1WA0Ze-0004Ix-6O for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:11:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:11:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1WA0Ze-0004Ix-6O@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1WA0ZV-0004I8-Ne for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:11:05 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1WA0ZU-0002nD-Dv for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:11:05 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.117] ([93.217.124.94]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2XkX-1VIS8e1HdN-00sJdf for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 18:10:37 +0100
Message-ID: <52EE7C06.9040906@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 18:10:30 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:R+MLSmvToPTp0NP+ayEA8C5r1WQPhbjNOa/hgboYUWMzmrlrIif KwCjn+VxUN98UshzeU723ClQzEHBMfTx78oftJ6bZ1U3eXrb5k6nKU7BKp0wEMveKMjyR9g AOrG+wOUL7XNF1PJcnkyFfyVcpH36GS+nNIoF6XO4mYU39BqxAuPz4kjO00Z4jPqzQ8rIkl U6xnG/mBkhBpGoIVs++QA==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.18; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.421, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1WA0ZU-0002nD-Dv 99eeaf1745d0fef6c029bb5a8da421c6
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: getting the HTTP/1.1 specs published
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/52EE7C06.9040906@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/22064
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hi there. Right now the HTTP/1.1 specs are past IESG evaluation, and a lot of COMMENTs and a few DISCUSSes (hopefully) have been resolved. Most of the hard work has been done by Roy Fielding. Thanks for that! The changes have not been published yet; however I plan to create a new set of drafts (-26) sometime this week. Once these are approved for publication they will be essentially sealed except for grammar and typos. In the meantime what has changed since -25 can already be reviewed; see either the trac timeline <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/timeline> or the issues list <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/query?status=assigned&status=closed&status=new&status=reopened&milestone=26&col=id&col=summary&col=milestone&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&order=priority> or the diff documents: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest-from-previous.diff.html> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-latest-from-previous.diff.html <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-latest-from-previous.diff.html> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest-from-previous.diff.html> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-latest-from-previous.diff.html> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-latest-from-previous.diff.html> Best regards, Julian
- getting the HTTP/1.1 specs published Julian Reschke