IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1

"Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com> Mon, 18 March 2013 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4649121F8CDD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.292, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3FgxO0FZ4Zk for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B105021F8C7D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UHYII-0004BI-2d for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:31:58 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:31:58 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UHYII-0004BI-2d@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <adrien@qbik.com>) id 1UHYI4-0004AZ-T7 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:31:44 +0000
Received: from smtp.qbik.com ([210.55.214.35]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <adrien@qbik.com>) id 1UHYI3-0006yM-Ah for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:31:44 +0000
Received: From [192.168.0.10] (unverified [192.168.0.10]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v7.5.0 (Build 3512)) with SMTP id <0019582157@smtp.qbik.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:31:20 +1300
From: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:31:19 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"
In-Reply-To: <35799.1363605458@critter.freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <em94119d23-43b0-4de4-a3e3-8c30e8a40bfc@bombed>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
User-Agent: eM_Client/5.0.17595.0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=210.55.214.35; envelope-from=adrien@qbik.com; helo=smtp.qbik.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.153, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UHYI3-0006yM-Ah 4a11dce5a0d78bf6e6d36e03d2a225f8
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/em94119d23-43b0-4de4-a3e3-8c30e8a40bfc@bombed>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17053
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

------ Original Message ------
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>; "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" 
<ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 19/03/2013 12:17:38 a.m.
Subject: Re: WGLC p6 4.2.1
>In message <ema8b6f777-7b08-4723-b705-f55ab8fa61af@bombed>, "Adrien W. 
>de Croy" writes:
>
>>for instance a cache receiving a request with If-Modified-Since later
>>than its own Last-Modified, may presume the client has a later copy, 
>>and
>>discard its own copy.
>
>Uhm, so you're saying I can clean the entire cache with bogos IMS
>requests ?

that's not the point.

There could be any number of ways a cache could be depending on the 
current specification which requires that IMS came from a previous LM.

We're looking to change that between v20 and v21 just before last call.  
In a sub-part of the spec.

I think it's a non-trivial change, and deserves more discussion, and is 
possibly beyond the mandate for httpbis.


>
>That doesn't sound optimal or even sensible to me...
>
>--
>Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by 
>incompetence.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email