Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt

[Roberto Peon <[e-mail]>]

As far as I can tell you have included everything discussed, including
hop-by-hop vs end-to-end distinctions, a workable extension id space, as
well as an example.
Coolness!

-=R
On Nov 8, 2013 11:25 AM, "Mike Bishop" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>  Since I was volunteered at the working group meeting to share this,
> here’s the current version of my draft.  I will re-emphasize that this is
> strictly a strawman, and any suggestions on how to improve this are more
> than welcome.
>
>  Sent from Windows Mail
>
>   *From:* [e-mail]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 8, 2013 11:16 AM
> *To:* Mike Bishop <[e-mail]>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Mike Bishop and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Filename:  draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames
> Revision:  00
> Title:   Extension Frames in HTTP/2.0
> Creation date:  2013-11-08
> Group:   Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 10
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt
> Status:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames
> Htmlized:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00
>
>
> Abstract:
>    This document describes a proposed modification to the HTTP/2.0
>    specification to better support the creation of extensions without
>    the need to version the core protocol or invoke additional protocol
>    identifiers.
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>